PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IOO vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IOO vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IOO having a 12.26% return and VT slightly lower at 12.24%. Over the past 10 years, IOO has outperformed VT with an annualized return of 16.70%, while VT has yielded a comparatively lower 12.74% annualized return.


IOO

1D
-1.33%
1M
5.37%
YTD
12.26%
6M
12.43%
1Y
38.24%
3Y*
25.48%
5Y*
16.68%
10Y*
16.70%

VT

1D
-0.88%
1M
4.91%
YTD
12.24%
6M
13.14%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
12.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IOO vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
12.26%27.02%26.54%27.71%-16.34%26.03%18.61%30.01%-6.22%23.56%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
12.24%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between IOO and VT is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2008

0.94

The correlation between IOO and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

IOO vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IOO
VT

Technology

46.2%
27.8%

Communication Services

11.0%
8.3%

Financial Services

9.1%
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
9.5%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
4.8%

Industrials

4.8%
12.0%

Energy

3.6%
4.3%

Basic Materials

1.7%
4.2%

Utilities

0.5%
2.7%

Real Estate

0.2%
2.4%

Technology

IOO
46.2%
VT
27.8%

Communication Services

IOO
11.0%
VT
8.3%

Financial Services

IOO
9.1%
VT
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IOO
8.4%
VT
9.5%

Healthcare

IOO
8.4%
VT
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

IOO
5.6%
VT
4.8%

Industrials

IOO
4.8%
VT
12.0%

Energy

IOO
3.6%
VT
4.3%

Basic Materials

IOO
1.7%
VT
4.2%

Utilities

IOO
0.5%
VT
2.7%

Real Estate

IOO
0.2%
VT
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IOO vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IOO
IOO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IOO vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IOOVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.42

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

3.04

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.94

13.53

+4.41

IOO vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IOO and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IOOVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84

2.31

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.69

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.74

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.44

-0.04

Drawdowns

IOO vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IOO drawdown since its inception was -55.85%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOO and VT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IOOVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.85%

-50.27%

-5.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.94%

-9.67%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.19%

-16.51%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.52%

-26.38%

+2.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.43%

-34.24%

+2.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-0.88%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.27%

-7.02%

-4.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

2.17%

-0.03%

Volatility

IOO vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) have volatilities of 3.81% and 3.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IOOVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

3.83%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.59%

10.17%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.54%

12.70%

+0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

16.05%

+0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.78%

17.23%

+0.55%

IOO vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IOO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

IOO vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

IOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than VT's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
0.82%0.92%1.08%1.49%2.00%1.53%1.49%2.02%2.54%2.23%2.75%2.89%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.59%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, IOO and VT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VT has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to IOO (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IOO dropped -55.85% vs VT's -50.27%.

On 10-year performance, IOO leads with 16.70% vs 12.74% for VT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IOO has performed better with a 16.70% return vs 12.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IOO.

VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.82% for IOO.

IOO tracks S&P Global 100 Index (Net), while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IOO and 0.06% for VT.

IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IOO and VT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer