IOO vs. QQQ
IOO (iShares Global 100 ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IOO is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 100 Index (Net), while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IOO returned 16.63%/yr vs 22.07%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IOO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
IOO vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IOO achieves a 7.38% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, IOO has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 16.63%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.07% annualized return.
IOO
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -3.92%
- YTD
- 7.38%
- 6M
- 6.92%
- 1Y
- 31.18%
- 3Y*
- 23.11%
- 5Y*
- 15.43%
- 10Y*
- 16.63%
QQQ
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 16.45%
- 6M
- 14.99%
- 1Y
- 34.88%
- 3Y*
- 26.05%
- 5Y*
- 16.01%
- 10Y*
- 22.07%
IOO vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 7.38% | 27.02% | 26.54% | 27.71% | -16.34% | 26.03% | 18.61% | 30.01% | -6.22% | 23.56% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 16.45% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between IOO and QQQ is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2000 | 0.81 |
The correlation between IOO and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.93 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IOO vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IOO
QQQ
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
IOO
QQQ
Communication Services
IOO
QQQ
Financial Services
IOO
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
IOO
QQQ
Healthcare
IOO
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
IOO
QQQ
Industrials
IOO
QQQ
Energy
IOO
QQQ
Basic Materials
IOO
QQQ
Utilities
IOO
QQQ
Real Estate
IOO
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IOO vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
IOO
QQQ
IOO vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IOO | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.35 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 2.93 | +0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.53 | 10.86 | +2.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IOO vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IOO drawdown since its inception was -55.85%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOO and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IOO | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.85% | -82.97% | +27.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.94% | -11.96% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.19% | -22.77% | +3.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.52% | -35.12% | +11.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.43% | -35.12% | +3.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.61% | -4.25% | -1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.25% | -32.73% | +21.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | 3.22% | -0.91% |
Volatility
IOO vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) is 5.30%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 9.17%. This indicates that IOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IOO | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.30% | 9.17% | -3.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.51% | 14.57% | -3.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.27% | 17.96% | -3.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 22.69% | -5.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.73% | 22.42% | -4.69% |
IOO vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IOO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
IOO vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
IOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, more than QQQ's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 0.86% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 1.49% | 2.00% | 1.53% | 1.49% | 2.02% | 2.54% | 2.23% | 2.75% | 2.89% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, IOO and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QQQ has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to IOO (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IOO dropped -55.85% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.07% vs 16.63% for IOO. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IOO has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.07% return vs 16.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IOO.
IOO has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.43% for QQQ.
IOO is categorized as Global Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. IOO tracks S&P Global 100 Index (Net), while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IOO and 0.18% for QQQ.
IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IOO and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer