IOO vs. INKM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IOO (iShares Global 100 ETF) and INKM (SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF) are both Global Equities funds. IOO is passively managed, while INKM is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, IOO returned 16.70%/yr vs 5.59%/yr for INKM. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IOO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for INKM.

Performance

IOO vs. INKM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IOO achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly higher than INKM's 5.61% return. Over the past 10 years, IOO has outperformed INKM with an annualized return of 16.70%, while INKM has yielded a comparatively lower 5.59% annualized return.

IOO

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: 5.37%
• YTD: 12.26%
• 6M: 12.43%
• 1Y: 38.24%
• 3Y*: 25.48%
• 5Y*: 16.68%
• 10Y*: 16.70%

INKM

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.93%
• YTD: 5.61%
• 6M: 5.74%
• 1Y: 13.00%
• 3Y*: 10.04%
• 5Y*: 3.96%
• 10Y*: 5.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IOO vs. INKM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF	12.26%	27.02%	26.54%	27.71%	-16.34%	26.03%	18.61%	30.01%	-6.22%	23.56%
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF	5.61%	11.86%	5.70%	10.26%	-12.58%	8.52%	3.11%	17.12%	-5.32%	13.95%

Correlation

The correlation between IOO and INKM is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2012	0.70

The correlation between IOO and INKM shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (3 years) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IOO vs. INKM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IOO	INKM
Technology	46.2%	13.2%
Communication Services	11.0%	6.2%
Financial Services	9.1%	8.3%
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	5.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	6.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	8.6%
Industrials	4.8%	14.6%
Energy	3.6%	11.1%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.4%
Utilities	0.5%	13.9%
Real Estate	0.2%	10.9%

Return for Risk

IOO vs. INKM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IOO

IOO Risk / Return Rank: 82
IOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
IOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
IOO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
IOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
IOO Martin Ratio Rank: 85

INKM

INKM Risk / Return Rank: 65
INKM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
INKM Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
INKM Omega Ratio Rank: 69
INKM Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
INKM Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IOO vs. INKM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IOO	INKM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.84	2.20	+0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	3.12	+0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.42	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.87	2.87	+1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.94	11.30	+6.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IOO vs. INKM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is comparable to the INKM Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IOO and INKM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IOO	INKM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.84	2.20	+0.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98	0.48	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94	0.57	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.57	-0.18

Drawdowns

IOO vs. INKM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IOO drawdown since its inception was -55.85%, which is greater than INKM's maximum drawdown of -28.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOO and INKM.

Drawdown Indicators

	IOO	INKM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.85%	-28.58%	-27.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.94%	-4.55%	-5.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.19%	-9.25%	-9.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.52%	-19.18%	-4.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.43%	-28.58%	-2.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.33%	-0.33%	-1.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.27%	-3.69%	-7.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	1.15%	+0.99%

Volatility

IOO vs. INKM - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) at 1.67%. This indicates that IOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INKM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IOO	INKM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.81%	1.67%	+2.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.59%	4.59%	+6.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.54%	5.95%	+7.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.04%	8.30%	+8.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.78%	9.78%	+8.00%

IOO vs. INKM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IOO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than INKM's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

IOO vs. INKM - Dividend Comparison

IOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than INKM's 4.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF	4.86%	5.82%	4.83%	4.56%	5.03%	3.74%	3.88%	4.38%	4.08%	3.10%	3.39%	3.45%
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF	0.82%	0.92%	1.08%	1.49%	2.00%	1.53%	1.49%	2.02%	2.54%	2.23%	2.75%	2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IOO and INKM in my portfolio?

IOO and INKM have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IOO or INKM?

IOO has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to INKM (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IOO dropped -55.85% vs INKM's -28.58%.

Which ETF is better, IOO or INKM?

On 10-year performance, IOO leads with 16.70% vs 5.59% for INKM. On fees, IOO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, INKM has been the lower-risk option at 1.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IOO or INKM?

Over the 10-year period, IOO has performed better with a 16.70% return vs 5.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IOO or INKM?

IOO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for INKM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IOO or INKM?

INKM has the higher dividend yield at 4.86%, compared with 0.82% for IOO.

What is the main difference between IOO and INKM?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IOO and 0.50% for INKM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.