IOO vs. DGRO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IOO (iShares Global 100 ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IOO is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 100 Index (Net), while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IOO returned 16.70%/yr vs 13.30%/yr for DGRO. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IOO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.

Performance

IOO vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IOO achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 8.76% return. Over the past 10 years, IOO has outperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 16.70%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.30% annualized return.

IOO

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: 5.37%
• YTD: 12.26%
• 6M: 12.43%
• 1Y: 38.24%
• 3Y*: 25.48%
• 5Y*: 16.68%
• 10Y*: 16.70%

DGRO

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 3.14%
• YTD: 8.76%
• 6M: 8.75%
• 1Y: 22.54%
• 3Y*: 16.99%
• 5Y*: 10.54%
• 10Y*: 13.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IOO vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF	12.26%	27.02%	26.54%	27.71%	-16.34%	26.03%	18.61%	30.01%	-6.22%	23.56%
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF	8.76%	15.69%	16.62%	10.47%	-7.91%	26.64%	9.50%	29.87%	-2.38%	23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IOO and DGRO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014	0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between IOO and DGRO has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IOO vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IOO	DGRO
Technology	46.2%	19.4%
Communication Services	11.0%	0.1%
Financial Services	9.1%	21.2%
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	5.7%
Healthcare	8.4%	16.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	11.5%
Industrials	4.8%	10.8%
Energy	3.6%	5.6%
Basic Materials	1.7%	2.5%
Utilities	0.5%	6.9%
Real Estate	0.2%	-

Return for Risk

IOO vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IOO

IOO Risk / Return Rank: 82
IOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
IOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
IOO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
IOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
IOO Martin Ratio Rank: 85

DGRO

DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 71
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 70
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IOO vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IOO	DGRO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.84	2.39	+0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	3.49	+0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.43	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.87	3.50	+0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.94	13.52	+4.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IOO vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IOO and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IOO	DGRO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.84	2.39	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98	0.77	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94	0.80	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.76	-0.37

Drawdowns

IOO vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IOO drawdown since its inception was -55.85%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOO and DGRO.

Drawdown Indicators

	IOO	DGRO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.85%	-35.10%	-20.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.94%	-6.47%	-3.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.19%	-14.03%	-5.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.52%	-19.31%	-4.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.43%	-35.10%	+3.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.33%	-0.28%	-1.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.27%	-3.44%	-7.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	1.67%	+0.47%

Volatility

IOO vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.21%. This indicates that IOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IOO	DGRO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.81%	2.21%	+1.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.59%	6.91%	+3.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.54%	9.48%	+4.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.04%	13.82%	+3.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.78%	16.62%	+1.16%

IOO vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IOO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

IOO vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

IOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than DGRO's 1.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF	1.96%	2.09%	2.26%	2.45%	2.34%	1.93%	2.30%	2.21%	2.44%	2.03%	2.27%	2.52%
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF	0.82%	0.92%	1.08%	1.49%	2.00%	1.53%	1.49%	2.02%	2.54%	2.23%	2.75%	2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IOO and DGRO in my portfolio?

IOO and DGRO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IOO or DGRO?

IOO has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IOO dropped -55.85% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

Which ETF is better, IOO or DGRO?

On 10-year performance, IOO leads with 16.70% vs 13.30% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IOO or DGRO?

Over the 10-year period, IOO has performed better with a 16.70% return vs 13.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IOO or DGRO?

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IOO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IOO or DGRO?

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.82% for IOO.

What is the main difference between IOO and DGRO?

IOO is categorized as Global Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. IOO tracks S&P Global 100 Index (Net), while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IOO and 0.08% for DGRO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.