IONZ vs. MSTZ
IONZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short IONQ ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IONZ returned -94.12% vs 299.04% for MSTZ. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IONZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.
Performance
IONZ vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IONZ achieves a -76.00% return, which is significantly lower than MSTZ's -27.52% return.
IONZ
- 1D
- 12.86%
- 1M
- 116.73%
- 6M
- -71.26%
- YTD
- -76.00%
- 1Y
- -94.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTZ
- 1D
- 6.51%
- 1M
- 38.88%
- 6M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- -27.52%
- 1Y
- 299.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IONZ vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IONZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short IONQ ETF | -76.00% | -80.36% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -27.52% | 234.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between IONZ and MSTZ is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IONZ vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank
IONZ
MSTZ
IONZ vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short IONQ ETF (IONZ) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IONZ | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.33 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | 3.55 | -4.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | 6.84 | -8.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IONZ vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IONZ drawdown since its inception was -98.66%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IONZ and MSTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IONZ | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.66% | -99.38% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -98.41% | -84.89% | -13.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.05% | -97.53% | +1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.45% | -94.55% | +19.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 78.56% | 43.95% | +34.61% |
Volatility
IONZ vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short IONQ ETF (IONZ) is 40.37%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 55.03%. This indicates that IONZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IONZ | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 40.37% | 55.03% | -14.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 155.08% | 134.45% | +20.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 186.72% | 148.58% | +38.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 185.79% | 170.73% | +15.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 185.79% | 170.73% | +15.06% |
IONZ vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IONZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
IONZ vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither IONZ nor MSTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IONZ and MSTZ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTZ has higher volatility (55.03%) compared to IONZ (40.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IONZ dropped -98.66% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.
On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 299.04% vs -94.12% for IONZ. On fees, MSTZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, IONZ has been the lower-risk option at 40.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 299.04% return vs -94.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSTZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for IONZ.
IONZ and MSTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for IONZ and 1.05% for MSTZ.
MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IONZ and MSTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer