PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IONZ vs. MSTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IONZ vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short IONQ ETF (IONZ) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IONZ achieves a -86.94% return, which is significantly lower than MSTZ's 1.05% return.


IONZ

1D
11.28%
1M
22.82%
YTD
-86.94%
6M
-84.33%
1Y
-97.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTZ

1D
19.27%
1M
186.45%
YTD
1.05%
6M
9.89%
1Y
279.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IONZ vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IONZ and MSTZ is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.50

The correlation between IONZ and MSTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IONZ vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IONZ
IONZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
IONZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IONZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
IONZ Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IONZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
IONZ Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTZ
MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IONZ vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short IONQ ETF (IONZ) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IONZMSTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.32

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

3.31

-4.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.28

6.57

-7.85

IONZ vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IONZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IONZ and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IONZ vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IONZ drawdown since its inception was -98.66%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IONZ and MSTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IONZMSTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.66%

-99.38%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-98.48%

-84.89%

-13.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.85%

-96.56%

-1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.23%

-94.46%

+20.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

78.39%

42.70%

+35.69%

Volatility

IONZ vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Short IONQ ETF (IONZ) has a higher volatility of 53.81% compared to T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) at 46.08%. This indicates that IONZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IONZMSTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

53.81%

46.08%

+7.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

152.53%

129.73%

+22.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

187.36%

145.84%

+41.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

187.10%

170.65%

+16.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

187.10%

170.65%

+16.45%

IONZ vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IONZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

IONZ vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither IONZ nor MSTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IONZ and MSTZ have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IONZ has higher volatility (53.81%) compared to MSTZ (46.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IONZ dropped -98.66% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 279.21% vs -97.85% for IONZ. On fees, MSTZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, MSTZ has been the lower-risk option at 46.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 279.21% return vs -97.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MSTZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for IONZ.

IONZ and MSTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for IONZ and 1.05% for MSTZ.

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IONZ and MSTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer