INVN vs. GRNJ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

INVN (Alger Russell Innovation ETF) and GRNJ (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. INVN is passively managed, while GRNJ is actively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INVN charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRNJ.

Performance

INVN vs. GRNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Russell Innovation ETF (INVN) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INVN achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly lower than GRNJ's 27.32% return.

INVN

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: 8.00%
• YTD: 3.03%
• 6M: 2.97%
• 1Y: 17.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GRNJ

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: 8.18%
• YTD: 27.32%
• 6M: 22.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INVN vs. GRNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
INVN Alger Russell Innovation ETF	3.03%	4.23%
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF	27.32%	5.14%

Correlation

The correlation between INVN and GRNJ is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.31

Return for Risk

INVN vs. GRNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INVN

INVN Risk / Return Rank: 23
INVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
INVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
INVN Omega Ratio Rank: 24
INVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
INVN Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INVN vs. GRNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Russell Innovation ETF (INVN) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INVN	GRNJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.87	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.27	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INVN	GRNJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	2.44	-2.09

Drawdowns

INVN vs. GRNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INVN drawdown since its inception was -26.01%, which is greater than GRNJ's maximum drawdown of -17.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INVN and GRNJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	INVN	GRNJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.01%	-17.32%	-8.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.79%	-0.21%	-2.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.65%	-4.10%	-3.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.78%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	INVN	GRNJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.25%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.42%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.32%	29.83%	-8.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.82%	29.83%	-6.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.82%	29.83%	-6.01%

INVN vs. GRNJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

INVN has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than GRNJ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

INVN vs. GRNJ - Dividend Comparison

INVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, while GRNJ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%
INVN Alger Russell Innovation ETF	0.28%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INVN and GRNJ in my portfolio?

INVN and GRNJ have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, INVN or GRNJ?

On fees, INVN is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, INVN or GRNJ?

INVN is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRNJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INVN or GRNJ?

INVN has the higher dividend yield at 0.28%, compared with 0.00% for GRNJ.

What is the main difference between INVN and GRNJ?

They also come from different issuers: Alger and Fundstrat. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for INVN and 0.75% for GRNJ.