INVN vs. ATFV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

INVN (Alger Russell Innovation ETF) and ATFV (Alger 35 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INVN is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Alger Russell Innovation Index, while ATFV is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, INVN returned 24.54% vs 26.14% for ATFV. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.55% expense ratio.

Performance

INVN vs. ATFV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Russell Innovation ETF (INVN) and Alger 35 ETF (ATFV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with INVN having a 9.96% return and ATFV slightly higher at 10.01%.

INVN

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 7.03%
• 6M: 18.92%
• YTD: 9.96%
• 1Y: 24.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.69%

ATFV

• 1D: 2.68%
• 1M: -2.89%
• 6M: 12.26%
• YTD: 10.01%
• 1Y: 26.14%
• 3Y*: 33.90%
• 5Y*: 12.57%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ATFV Alger 35 ETF	$2.07M	$1.55M	$2.50M
INVN Alger Russell Innovation ETF	$258.38K	$157.49K	$106.45K

INVN vs. ATFV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
INVN Alger Russell Innovation ETF	9.96%	6.56%
ATFV Alger 35 ETF	10.01%	29.85%

Correlation

The correlation between INVN and ATFV is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2025	0.41

The correlation between INVN and ATFV shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

INVN vs. ATFV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

INVN

INVN Risk / Return Rank: 37
INVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
INVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
INVN Omega Ratio Rank: 39
INVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
INVN Martin Ratio Rank: 31

ATFV

ATFV Risk / Return Rank: 35
ATFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
ATFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
ATFV Omega Ratio Rank: 33
ATFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
ATFV Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

INVN vs. ATFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Russell Innovation ETF (INVN) and Alger 35 ETF (ATFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INVN	ATFV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	0.84	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	1.32	+0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.16	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.14	1.23	-0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.88	3.72	-0.83

INVN vs. ATFV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INVN Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the ATFV Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INVN and ATFV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INVN vs. ATFV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INVN drawdown since its inception was -26.01%, smaller than the maximum ATFV drawdown of -45.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INVN and ATFV.

Drawdown Indicators

	INVN	ATFV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.01%	-45.34%	+19.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.39%	-18.29%	-2.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.01%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.22%	-8.11%	+5.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.36%	-17.46%	+10.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.06%	6.05%	+2.01%

Volatility

INVN vs. ATFV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alger Russell Innovation ETF (INVN) is 9.21%, while Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) has a volatility of 10.70%. This indicates that INVN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INVN	ATFV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.21%	10.70%	-1.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.77%	21.93%	-2.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.55%	26.95%	-3.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.39%	27.36%	-2.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.39%	26.99%	-2.60%

INVN vs. ATFV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both INVN and ATFV have an expense ratio of 0.55%.

Dividends

INVN vs. ATFV - Dividend Comparison

INVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, more than ATFV's 0.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ATFV Alger 35 ETF	0.18%	0.20%	0.16%	0.01%	0.06%
INVN Alger Russell Innovation ETF	0.26%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INVN and ATFV in my portfolio?

INVN and ATFV have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INVN or ATFV?

ATFV has higher volatility (10.70%) compared to INVN (9.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INVN dropped -26.01% vs ATFV's -45.34%.

Which ETF is better, INVN or ATFV?

On 1-year performance, ATFV leads with 26.14% vs 24.54% for INVN. Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. On volatility, INVN has been the lower-risk option at 9.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INVN or ATFV?

Over the 1-year period, ATFV has performed better with a 26.14% return vs 24.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INVN or ATFV?

INVN and ATFV have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INVN or ATFV?

INVN has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.18% for ATFV.

What is the main difference between INVN and ATFV?

INVN is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while ATFV is Large Cap Growth Equities. INVN tracks Alger Russell Innovation Index, while ATFV tracks S&P 500.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INVN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.