INVG vs. SCHJ
INVG (GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF) and SCHJ (Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INVG is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by GMO, while SCHJ is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US 1-5 Year Corporate Bond Index. INVG is actively managed, while SCHJ is passively managed. Over the past year, INVG returned 2.61% vs 3.34% for SCHJ. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. INVG charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHJ.
Performance
INVG vs. SCHJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INVG achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than SCHJ's 1.10% return.
INVG
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- 2.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.56%
SCHJ
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 3.34%
- 3Y*
- 5.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.39%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.65%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $27.15K | $47.67K | $107.50K | |
| $6.30M | $7.81M | $6.60M |
INVG vs. SCHJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
INVG GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF | 0.30% | 5.03% |
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 1.10% | 3.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between INVG and SCHJ is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025 | 0.85 |
The correlation between INVG and SCHJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INVG vs. SCHJ — Risk / Return Rank
INVG
SCHJ
INVG vs. SCHJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF (INVG) and Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INVG | SCHJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.33 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 2.28 | -1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.45 | 8.57 | -6.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INVG vs. SCHJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INVG drawdown since its inception was -3.15%, smaller than the maximum SCHJ drawdown of -13.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INVG and SCHJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INVG | SCHJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.15% | -13.62% | +10.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.15% | -1.47% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.26% | 0.00% | -1.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.75% | -1.84% | +1.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.07% | 0.39% | +0.68% |
Volatility
INVG vs. SCHJ - Volatility Comparison
GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF (INVG) has a higher volatility of 1.37% compared to Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) at 0.57%. This indicates that INVG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INVG | SCHJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.37% | 0.57% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.56% | 1.55% | +2.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.41% | 1.87% | +2.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.45% | 2.96% | +1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.45% | 4.10% | +0.35% |
INVG vs. SCHJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
INVG has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHJ's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
INVG vs. SCHJ - Dividend Comparison
INVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than SCHJ's 4.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INVG GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF | 4.87% | 2.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 4.52% | 4.42% | 4.00% | 2.98% | 1.64% | 0.94% | 2.54% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INVG and SCHJ have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INVG has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to SCHJ (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INVG dropped -3.15% vs SCHJ's -13.62%.
On 1-year performance, SCHJ leads with 3.34% vs 2.61% for INVG. On fees, SCHJ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCHJ has performed better with a 3.34% return vs 2.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHJ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for INVG.
INVG has the higher dividend yield at 4.87%, compared with 4.52% for SCHJ.
INVG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SCHJ is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: GMO and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for INVG and 0.03% for SCHJ.
SCHJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INVG and SCHJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer