OCUL vs. FOR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

OCUL (Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.) and FOR (Forestar Group Inc.) are both stocks. OCUL operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while FOR operates in Real Estate - Development (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, OCUL returned 6.79%/yr vs 9.31%/yr for FOR. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

OCUL vs. FOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. (OCUL) and Forestar Group Inc. (FOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCUL achieves a -17.87% return, which is significantly lower than FOR's 17.82% return. Over the past 10 years, OCUL has underperformed FOR with an annualized return of 6.79%, while FOR has yielded a comparatively higher 9.31% annualized return.

OCUL

• 1D: 5.73%
• 1M: 21.14%
• YTD: -17.87%
• 6M: -23.07%
• 1Y: 22.63%
• 3Y*: 26.98%
• 5Y*: -7.10%
• 10Y*: 6.79%

FOR

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: 11.96%
• YTD: 17.82%
• 6M: 18.11%
• 1Y: 48.90%
• 3Y*: 11.03%
• 5Y*: 7.02%
• 10Y*: 9.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCUL vs. FOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OCUL Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.	-17.87%	42.15%	91.48%	58.72%	-59.68%	-66.33%	424.05%	-0.75%	-10.56%	-46.83%
FOR Forestar Group Inc.	17.82%	-4.98%	-21.62%	114.60%	-29.15%	7.78%	-3.21%	50.54%	-37.05%	65.41%

Correlation

The correlation between OCUL and FOR is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2014	0.21

The correlation between OCUL and FOR shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap OCUL : $2.23B FOR : $1.48B
EPS OCUL : -$1.45 FOR : $3.28
PS Ratio OCUL : 38.49 FOR : 0.87
PB Ratio OCUL : 3.84 FOR : 0.81
Total Revenue (TTM) OCUL : $52.04M FOR : $1.71B
Gross Profit (TTM) OCUL : $45.40M FOR : $284.30M
EBITDA (TTM) OCUL : -$283.03M FOR : $169.50M

Return for Risk

OCUL vs. FOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCUL

OCUL Risk / Return Rank: 53
OCUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
OCUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
OCUL Omega Ratio Rank: 55
OCUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
OCUL Martin Ratio Rank: 50

FOR

FOR Risk / Return Rank: 78
FOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FOR Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FOR Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCUL vs. FOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. (OCUL) and Forestar Group Inc. (FOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OCUL	FOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.32	1.39	-1.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.05	2.19	-1.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.24	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.40	2.35	-1.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.75	4.88	-4.13

OCUL vs. FOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCUL Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the FOR Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCUL and FOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OCUL vs. FOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCUL drawdown since its inception was -95.19%, which is greater than FOR's maximum drawdown of -89.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCUL and FOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	OCUL	FOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.19%	-89.77%	-5.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.29%	-20.95%	-36.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-61.57%	-54.72%	-6.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-85.78%	-54.72%	-31.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-90.94%	-63.45%	-27.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-76.96%	-28.79%	-48.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-76.60%	-38.59%	-38.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.45%	10.05%	+20.40%

Volatility

OCUL vs. FOR - Volatility Comparison

Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. (OCUL) has a higher volatility of 17.46% compared to Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) at 8.45%. This indicates that OCUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OCUL	FOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.46%	8.45%	+9.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.60%	24.12%	+30.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.19%	35.51%	+34.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	78.55%	37.65%	+40.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	78.85%	37.59%	+41.26%

Dividends

OCUL vs. FOR - Dividend Comparison

Neither OCUL nor FOR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OCUL and FOR in my portfolio?

OCUL and FOR have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OCUL or FOR?

OCUL has higher volatility (17.46%) compared to FOR (8.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCUL dropped -95.19% vs FOR's -89.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.