INTU vs. CLBT
INTU (Intuit Inc.) and CLBT (Cellebrite DI Ltd.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — INTU in Software - Application, CLBT in Software - Infrastructure. Over the past 3 years, INTU returned -15.32%/yr vs 32.07%/yr for CLBT. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
INTU vs. CLBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INTU achieves a -58.10% return, which is significantly lower than CLBT's -11.59% return.
INTU
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- 6M
- -57.18%
- YTD
- -58.10%
- 1Y
- -62.82%
- 3Y*
- -15.32%
- 5Y*
- -10.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.85%
CLBT
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 24.14%
- 6M
- -13.65%
- YTD
- -11.59%
- 1Y
- 9.25%
- 3Y*
- 32.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTU vs. CLBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTU Intuit Inc. | -58.10% | 6.09% | 1.16% | 61.76% | -39.12% | 13.87% |
CLBT Cellebrite DI Ltd. | -11.59% | -18.16% | 154.39% | 98.62% | -45.64% | -23.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between INTU and CLBT is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2021 | 0.37 |
The correlation between INTU and CLBT shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
INTU:
$75.21B
CLBT:
$3.98B
INTU:
$16.37
CLBT:
$0.29
INTU:
16.80
CLBT:
55.70
INTU:
1.00
CLBT:
0.11
INTU:
3.68
CLBT:
8.06
INTU:
3.68
CLBT:
7.87
INTU:
$20.93B
CLBT:
$496.43M
INTU:
$16.97B
CLBT:
$416.33M
INTU:
$6.65B
CLBT:
$84.98M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INTU vs. CLBT — Risk / Return Rank
INTU
CLBT
INTU vs. CLBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intuit Inc. (INTU) and Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INTU | CLBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.70 | 1.08 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 0.19 | -1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.64 | 0.38 | -2.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INTU vs. CLBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INTU drawdown since its inception was -75.29%, which is greater than CLBT's maximum drawdown of -67.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTU and CLBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INTU | CLBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.29% | -67.74% | -7.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.19% | -43.61% | -24.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.19% | -57.58% | -10.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.56% | -38.69% | -26.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.23% | -34.69% | +10.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.28% | 21.03% | +17.25% |
Volatility
INTU vs. CLBT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Intuit Inc. (INTU) is 11.58%, while Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) has a volatility of 14.02%. This indicates that INTU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INTU | CLBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.58% | 14.02% | -2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.23% | 41.91% | +1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.43% | 53.17% | -7.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.82% | 50.35% | -12.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.09% | 50.35% | -16.26% |
Dividends
INTU vs. CLBT - Dividend Comparison
INTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, while CLBT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLBT Cellebrite DI Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INTU Intuit Inc. | 1.75% | 0.65% | 0.60% | 0.52% | 0.72% | 0.38% | 0.57% | 0.74% | 0.83% | 0.89% | 1.08% | 1.09% |
Financials
INTU vs. CLBT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intuit Inc. and Cellebrite DI Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
INTU vs. CLBT - Profitability Comparison
INTU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Intuit Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.24B and revenue of 8.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.
CLBT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cellebrite DI Ltd. reported a gross profit of 105.88M and revenue of 128.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.5%.
INTU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Intuit Inc. reported an operating income of 4.02B and revenue of 8.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 47.0%.
CLBT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cellebrite DI Ltd. reported an operating income of 9.23M and revenue of 128.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.2%.
INTU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Intuit Inc. reported a net income of 3.06B and revenue of 8.56B, resulting in a net margin of 35.8%.
CLBT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cellebrite DI Ltd. reported a net income of 10.94M and revenue of 128.30M, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
INTU and CLBT have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLBT has higher volatility (14.02%) compared to INTU (11.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTU dropped -75.29% vs CLBT's -67.74%.
CLBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INTU and CLBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer