CLBT vs. CRT
Compare and contrast key facts about Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CLBT or CRT.
Key characteristics
| CLBT | CRT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 33.26% | -18.08% |
| 1Y Return | 107.55% | -23.33% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.32% | 22.45% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.04 | -0.60 |
| Daily Std Dev | 37.38% | 42.51% |
| Max Drawdown | -67.74% | -83.46% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.10% | -48.23% |
Fundamentals
| CLBT | CRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.27B | $82.65M |
| EPS | -$0.43 | $1.92 |
| PE Ratio | 70.00 | 7.17 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $311.55M | $12.36M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $219.91M | $7.44M |
Correlation
The correlation between CLBT and CRT is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CLBT vs. CRT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CLBT achieves a 33.26% return, which is significantly higher than CRT's -18.08% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CLBT vs. CRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CLBT vs. CRT - Dividend Comparison
CLBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.38%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLBT Cellebrite DI Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CRT Cross Timbers Royalty Trust | 10.38% | 10.96% | 7.69% | 9.71% | 9.46% | 10.04% | 13.06% | 6.87% | 5.90% | 10.41% | 15.34% | 7.87% |
Drawdowns
CLBT vs. CRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLBT drawdown since its inception was -67.74%, smaller than the maximum CRT drawdown of -83.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLBT and CRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CLBT vs. CRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) is 6.55%, while Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) has a volatility of 11.86%. This indicates that CLBT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CLBT vs. CRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cellebrite DI Ltd. and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities