CLBT vs. ABSI
CLBT (Cellebrite DI Ltd.) and ABSI (Absci Corporation) are both stocks. CLBT operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while ABSI operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 3 years, CLBT returned 23.87%/yr vs 56.24%/yr for ABSI. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CLBT vs. ABSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLBT achieves a -18.19% return, which is significantly lower than ABSI's 122.92% return.
CLBT
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -5.75%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- -18.19%
- 1Y
- 7.66%
- 3Y*
- 23.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.22%
ABSI
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -33.05%
- 6M
- 160.20%
- YTD
- 122.92%
- 1Y
- 168.28%
- 3Y*
- 56.24%
- 5Y*
- -22.86%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -17.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $21.31M | $35.90M | $45.15M | |
| $16.88M | $22.74M | $28.71M |
CLBT vs. ABSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLBT Cellebrite DI Ltd. | -18.19% | -18.16% | 154.39% | 98.62% | -45.64% | -23.40% |
ABSI Absci Corporation | 122.92% | 33.21% | -37.62% | 100.00% | -74.39% | -54.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLBT and ABSI is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2021 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
CLBT:
$3.68B
ABSI:
$1.32B
CLBT:
$0.29
ABSI:
-$0.79
CLBT:
7.46
ABSI:
715.67
CLBT:
7.28
ABSI:
6.92
CLBT:
$496.43M
ABSI:
$1.62M
CLBT:
$416.33M
ABSI:
-$21.67M
CLBT:
$84.98M
ABSI:
-$115.23M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLBT vs. ABSI — Risk / Return Rank
CLBT
ABSI
CLBT vs. ABSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) and Absci Corporation (ABSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLBT | ABSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.31 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 3.26 | -3.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.25 | 6.14 | -5.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLBT vs. ABSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLBT drawdown since its inception was -67.74%, smaller than the maximum ABSI drawdown of -96.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLBT and ABSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLBT | ABSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.74% | -96.20% | +28.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.61% | -54.00% | +10.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.58% | -66.06% | +8.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -95.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.27% | -74.31% | +31.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.78% | -84.31% | +49.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.74% | 28.60% | -6.86% |
Volatility
CLBT vs. ABSI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) is 11.04%, while Absci Corporation (ABSI) has a volatility of 24.57%. This indicates that CLBT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLBT | ABSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.04% | 24.57% | -13.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.53% | 76.53% | -35.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.38% | 104.44% | -51.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.19% | 98.15% | -47.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.19% | 98.23% | -48.04% |
Dividends
CLBT vs. ABSI - Dividend Comparison
Neither CLBT nor ABSI has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CLBT vs. ABSI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cellebrite DI Ltd. and Absci Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CLBT and ABSI have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABSI has higher volatility (24.57%) compared to CLBT (11.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLBT dropped -67.74% vs ABSI's -96.20%.
ABSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLBT and ABSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer