PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INTM vs. ZMUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INTM vs. ZMUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF (INTM) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTM achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly higher than ZMUN's 1.61% return.


INTM

1D
0.08%
1M
0.72%
YTD
1.82%
6M
2.27%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZMUN

1D
0.04%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.61%
6M
1.88%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTM vs. ZMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between INTM and ZMUN is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INTM vs. ZMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF (INTM) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

INTM vs. ZMUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INTMZMUNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.05

6.54

-3.49

Drawdowns

INTM vs. ZMUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTM drawdown since its inception was -2.65%, which is greater than ZMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTM and ZMUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INTMZMUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.65%

-0.09%

-2.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

0.00%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.48%

-0.01%

-0.47%

Volatility

INTM vs. ZMUN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INTMZMUNDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53%

0.54%

+1.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.53%

0.54%

+1.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.53%

0.54%

+1.99%

INTM vs. ZMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

INTM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ZMUN's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

INTM vs. ZMUN - Dividend Comparison

INTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than ZMUN's 2.28% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


INTM and ZMUN have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZMUN is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZMUN is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for INTM.

INTM has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 2.28% for ZMUN.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for INTM and 0.30% for ZMUN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INTM and ZMUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer