INTL vs. VEU

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

INTL (Main International ETF) and VEU (Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. INTL is actively managed, while VEU is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, INTL returned 14.56%/yr vs 17.58%/yr for VEU. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. INTL charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VEU.

Performance

INTL vs. VEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Main International ETF (INTL) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTL achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly lower than VEU's 13.33% return.

INTL

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -0.36%
• 6M: 4.01%
• YTD: 9.45%
• 1Y: 23.01%
• 3Y*: 14.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.24%

VEU

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -0.16%
• 6M: 7.25%
• YTD: 13.33%
• 1Y: 28.40%
• 3Y*: 17.58%
• 5Y*: 9.15%
• 10Y*: 9.66%
• ALL TIME*: 5.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
INTL Main International ETF	$1.43M	$1.29M	$972.08K
VEU Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF	$230.24M	$229.52M	$221.55M

INTL vs. VEU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
INTL Main International ETF	9.45%	29.55%	2.00%	18.20%	-1.69%
VEU Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF	13.33%	32.35%	5.56%	15.84%	-2.70%

Correlation

The correlation between INTL and VEU is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2022	0.96

The correlation between INTL and VEU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

INTL vs. VEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INTL	VEU
Financial Services	23.9%	23.1%
Technology	19.3%	23.2%
Industrials	14.2%	14.7%
Basic Materials	9.1%	6.5%
Consumer Cyclical	7.2%	7.6%
Healthcare	6.2%	6.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	4.9%
Energy	5.0%	4.3%
Communication Services	4.6%	4.2%
Utilities	3.1%	3.0%
Real Estate	2.0%	1.8%

Return for Risk

INTL vs. VEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

INTL

INTL Risk / Return Rank: 56
INTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
INTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
INTL Omega Ratio Rank: 55
INTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
INTL Martin Ratio Rank: 60

VEU

VEU Risk / Return Rank: 73
VEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
VEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
VEU Omega Ratio Rank: 74
VEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
VEU Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

INTL vs. VEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main International ETF (INTL) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INTL	VEU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	1.66	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	2.31	-0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.30	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	2.46	-0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.25	9.00	-1.75

INTL vs. VEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INTL Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the VEU Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTL and VEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INTL vs. VEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTL drawdown since its inception was -14.48%, smaller than the maximum VEU drawdown of -61.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTL and VEU.

Drawdown Indicators

	INTL	VEU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.48%	-61.52%	+47.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.51%	-11.43%	-0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.48%	-13.69%	-0.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.14%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.84%	-2.79%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.87%	-13.05%	+10.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.08%	3.12%	-0.04%

Volatility

INTL vs. VEU - Volatility Comparison

Main International ETF (INTL) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) have volatilities of 5.44% and 5.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INTL	VEU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.44%	5.31%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.08%	15.10%	-0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.99%	16.96%	+0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.79%	16.37%	-0.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.79%	17.08%	-1.29%

INTL vs. VEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

INTL has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than VEU's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

INTL vs. VEU - Dividend Comparison

INTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than VEU's 2.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INTL Main International ETF	3.42%	2.57%	2.71%	2.86%	1.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VEU Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF	2.56%	3.09%	3.24%	3.32%	3.12%	3.08%	2.00%	3.10%	3.27%	2.66%	2.96%	2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INTL and VEU in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, INTL and VEU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, INTL or VEU?

INTL has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to VEU (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTL dropped -14.48% vs VEU's -61.52%.

Which ETF is better, INTL or VEU?

On 3-year performance, VEU leads with 17.58% vs 14.56% for INTL. On fees, VEU is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VEU has been the lower-risk option at 5.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INTL or VEU?

Over the 3-year period, VEU has performed better with a 17.58% return vs 14.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INTL or VEU?

VEU is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for INTL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INTL or VEU?

INTL has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 2.56% for VEU.

What is the main difference between INTL and VEU?

They also come from different issuers: Main and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for INTL and 0.04% for VEU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.