INTL vs. IFLO
INTL (Main International ETF) and IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past year, INTL returned 23.96% vs 32.28% for IFLO. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. INTL charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for IFLO.
Performance
INTL vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INTL achieves a 9.95% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 16.93% return.
INTL
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- 9.95%
- 6M
- 10.07%
- 1Y
- 23.96%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFLO
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 16.93%
- 6M
- 16.46%
- 1Y
- 32.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTL vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
INTL Main International ETF | 9.95% | 12.74% |
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 16.93% | 13.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between INTL and IFLO is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.82 |
INTL vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INTL
IFLO
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
INTL
IFLO
Technology
INTL
IFLO
Industrials
INTL
IFLO
Basic Materials
INTL
IFLO
Consumer Cyclical
INTL
IFLO
Healthcare
INTL
IFLO
Consumer Defensive
INTL
IFLO
Energy
INTL
IFLO
Communication Services
INTL
IFLO
Utilities
INTL
IFLO
Real Estate
INTL
IFLO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INTL vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank
INTL
IFLO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
INTL vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main International ETF (INTL) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INTL | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.09 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INTL vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INTL drawdown since its inception was -14.48%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTL and IFLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INTL | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.48% | -6.44% | -8.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.51% | -6.44% | -5.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.39% | -3.37% | +0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.87% | -1.25% | -1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | — | — |
Volatility
INTL vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INTL | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.74% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.45% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.34% | 14.75% | +1.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 14.75% | +0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 14.75% | +0.99% |
INTL vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
INTL has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
INTL vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison
INTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than IFLO's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.51% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INTL Main International ETF | 3.40% | 2.57% | 2.71% | 2.86% | 1.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INTL and IFLO have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, IFLO leads with 32.28% vs 23.96% for INTL. On fees, IFLO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IFLO has performed better with a 32.28% return vs 23.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFLO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for INTL.
INTL has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 1.51% for IFLO.
They also come from different issuers: Main Funds and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for INTL and 0.56% for IFLO.
Find the right allocation for INTL and IFLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer