PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INTL vs. IFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INTL vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Main International ETF (INTL) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTL achieves a 9.95% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 16.93% return.


INTL

1D
0.79%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
9.95%
6M
10.07%
1Y
23.96%
3Y*
16.45%
5Y*
10Y*

IFLO

1D
0.43%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
16.93%
6M
16.46%
1Y
32.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTL vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between INTL and IFLO is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.82

INTL vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INTL
IFLO

Financial Services

23.4%
1.1%

Technology

17.6%
21.5%

Industrials

14.7%
18.1%

Basic Materials

9.9%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
13.8%

Healthcare

6.2%
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
2.8%

Energy

5.4%
12.1%

Communication Services

4.6%
6.7%

Utilities

3.0%
1.0%

Real Estate

2.1%
0.0%

Financial Services

INTL
23.4%
IFLO
1.1%

Technology

INTL
17.6%
IFLO
21.5%

Industrials

INTL
14.7%
IFLO
18.1%

Basic Materials

INTL
9.9%
IFLO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

INTL
7.6%
IFLO
13.8%

Healthcare

INTL
6.2%
IFLO
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

INTL
5.4%
IFLO
2.8%

Energy

INTL
5.4%
IFLO
12.1%

Communication Services

INTL
4.6%
IFLO
6.7%

Utilities

INTL
3.0%
IFLO
1.0%

Real Estate

INTL
2.1%
IFLO
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INTL vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTL
INTL Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
INTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTL Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
INTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTL Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

IFLO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTL vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main International ETF (INTL) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INTLIFLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.09

INTL vs. IFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INTL vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTL drawdown since its inception was -14.48%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTL and IFLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INTLIFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.48%

-6.44%

-8.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.51%

-6.44%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.39%

-3.37%

+0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

-1.25%

-1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

Volatility

INTL vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INTLIFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.34%

14.75%

+1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.74%

14.75%

+0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.74%

14.75%

+0.99%

INTL vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

INTL has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

INTL vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison

INTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than IFLO's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IFLO
VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF
1.51%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INTL
Main International ETF
3.40%2.57%2.71%2.86%1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


INTL and IFLO have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On 1-year performance, IFLO leads with 32.28% vs 23.96% for INTL. On fees, IFLO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IFLO has performed better with a 32.28% return vs 23.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IFLO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for INTL.

INTL has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 1.51% for IFLO.

They also come from different issuers: Main Funds and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for INTL and 0.56% for IFLO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INTL and IFLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer