INTC vs. NBIS
INTC (Intel Corporation) and NBIS (Nebius Group N.V.) are both stocks. INTC operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while NBIS operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past year, INTC returned 449.70% vs 351.53% for NBIS. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
INTC vs. NBIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INTC achieves a 198.83% return, which is significantly higher than NBIS's 160.44% return.
INTC
- 1D
- 11.19%
- 1M
- -11.73%
- YTD
- 198.83%
- 6M
- 173.62%
- 1Y
- 449.70%
- 3Y*
- 53.12%
- 5Y*
- 16.15%
- 10Y*
- 15.65%
NBIS
- 1D
- -4.31%
- 1M
- 23.13%
- YTD
- 160.44%
- 6M
- 117.28%
- 1Y
- 351.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTC vs. NBIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
INTC Intel Corporation | 198.83% | 84.04% | -10.65% |
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 160.44% | 202.18% | 46.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between INTC and NBIS is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024 | 0.23 |
Fundamentals
INTC:
$560.50B
NBIS:
$67.36B
INTC:
-$0.67
NBIS:
$3.17
INTC:
9.66
NBIS:
65.42
INTC:
5.03
NBIS:
9.30
INTC:
$53.76B
NBIS:
$877.90M
INTC:
$19.05B
NBIS:
$420.60M
INTC:
$8.83B
NBIS:
-$52.78M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INTC vs. NBIS — Risk / Return Rank
INTC
NBIS
INTC vs. NBIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intel Corporation (INTC) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INTC | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.41 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 18.76 | 7.79 | +10.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 44.28 | 17.86 | +26.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INTC | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.16 | 3.39 | +2.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 3.19 | -2.83 |
Drawdowns
INTC vs. NBIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INTC drawdown since its inception was -82.25%, which is greater than NBIS's maximum drawdown of -58.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTC and NBIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INTC | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.25% | -58.27% | -23.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.17% | -45.47% | +21.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.81% | -17.58% | +2.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.67% | -19.02% | -17.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.22% | 19.79% | -9.57% |
Volatility
INTC vs. NBIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Intel Corporation (INTC) is 26.82%, while Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a volatility of 33.60%. This indicates that INTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INTC | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.82% | 33.60% | -6.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.68% | 71.53% | -13.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.75% | 104.78% | -31.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.06% | 110.72% | -58.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.07% | 110.72% | -66.65% |
Dividends
INTC vs. NBIS - Dividend Comparison
Neither INTC nor NBIS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTC Intel Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.87% | 1.47% | 5.52% | 2.70% | 2.65% | 2.11% | 2.56% | 2.33% | 2.87% | 2.79% |
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
INTC vs. NBIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intel Corporation and Nebius Group N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
INTC and NBIS have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NBIS has higher volatility (33.60%) compared to INTC (26.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTC dropped -82.25% vs NBIS's -58.27%.
INTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.16 vs 3.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INTC and NBIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer