PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INTC vs. ES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INTC vs. ES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intel Corporation (INTC) and Eversource Energy (ES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTC achieves a 237.59% return, which is significantly higher than ES's 4.32% return. Over the past 10 years, INTC has outperformed ES with an annualized return of 17.03%, while ES has yielded a comparatively lower 5.44% annualized return.


INTC

1D
6.51%
1M
14.53%
YTD
237.59%
6M
229.46%
1Y
518.52%
3Y*
55.34%
5Y*
18.67%
10Y*
17.03%

ES

1D
0.38%
1M
3.48%
YTD
4.32%
6M
4.28%
1Y
10.16%
3Y*
4.00%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*
5.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTC vs. ES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INTC
Intel Corporation
237.59%84.04%-59.57%94.56%-46.64%6.05%-14.69%30.71%4.23%30.87%
ES
Eversource Energy
4.32%22.86%-2.46%-23.43%-5.06%8.18%4.45%34.49%6.41%17.97%

Correlation

The correlation between INTC and ES is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 1984

0.17

The correlation between INTC and ES shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INTC:

$633.19B

ES:

$25.87B

EPS

INTC:

-$0.67

ES:

$4.68

PS Ratio

INTC:

10.91

ES:

1.84

PB Ratio

INTC:

5.68

ES:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

INTC:

$53.76B

ES:

$13.93B

Gross Profit (TTM)

INTC:

$19.05B

ES:

$4.19B

EBITDA (TTM)

INTC:

$8.83B

ES:

$4.60B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INTC vs. ES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTC
INTC Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
INTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTC Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
INTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTC Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

ES
ES Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ES Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
ES Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ES Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ES Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTC vs. ES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intel Corporation (INTC) and Eversource Energy (ES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INTCESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+6.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.09

+0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

20.85

0.61

+20.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

48.84

1.46

+47.37

INTC vs. ES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INTC Sharpe Ratio is 6.84, which is higher than the ES Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTC and ES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INTC vs. ES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTC drawdown since its inception was -82.25%, which is greater than ES's maximum drawdown of -73.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTC and ES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INTCESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.25%

-73.04%

-9.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.17%

-15.13%

-9.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.80%

-28.65%

-35.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.53%

-41.69%

-23.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.80%

-41.69%

-29.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.76%

-13.32%

+9.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.66%

-19.06%

-17.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.30%

6.30%

+4.00%

Volatility

INTC vs. ES - Volatility Comparison

Intel Corporation (INTC) has a higher volatility of 24.56% compared to Eversource Energy (ES) at 7.72%. This indicates that INTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INTCESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.56%

7.72%

+16.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.47%

16.00%

+42.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.69%

24.68%

+49.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.29%

23.94%

+28.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.20%

24.35%

+19.85%

Dividends

INTC vs. ES - Dividend Comparison

INTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ES
Eversource Energy
4.48%4.47%4.98%4.37%3.04%2.65%2.62%2.52%3.11%3.01%3.22%3.27%
INTC
Intel Corporation
0.00%0.00%1.87%1.47%5.52%2.70%2.65%2.11%2.56%2.33%2.87%2.79%

Financials

INTC vs. ES - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intel Corporation and Eversource Energy. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
13.58B
4.50B
(INTC) Total Revenue
(ES) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


INTC and ES have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INTC has higher volatility (24.56%) compared to ES (7.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTC dropped -82.25% vs ES's -73.04%.

INTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.84 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INTC and ES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer