PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INTAX vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INTAX vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Strategic Municipal Income Fund (INTAX) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTAX achieves a 2.38% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.49% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with INTAX having a 2.26% annualized return and BIL not far behind at 2.18%.


INTAX

1D
0.27%
1M
1.08%
YTD
2.38%
6M
2.77%
1Y
8.75%
3Y*
4.69%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*
2.26%

BIL

1D
0.02%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.77%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
2.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTAX vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INTAX
Columbia Strategic Municipal Income Fund
2.38%3.80%3.72%7.92%-14.56%2.65%5.05%8.83%0.51%7.32%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.49%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%0.40%2.03%1.74%0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between INTAX and BIL is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2007

0.03

The correlation between INTAX and BIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.07 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INTAX vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTAX
INTAX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
INTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
INTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTAX vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Strategic Municipal Income Fund (INTAX) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INTAXBILDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.43

19.71

-17.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.87

174.16

-170.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

87.91

-86.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

355.35

-352.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.34

2,817.77

-2,808.44

INTAX vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INTAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTAX and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INTAXBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

19.71

-17.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

13.16

-13.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

8.52

-8.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

2.78

-2.10

Drawdowns

INTAX vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTAX drawdown since its inception was -36.87%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTAX and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INTAXBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.87%

-0.78%

-36.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-0.01%

-3.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.91%

-0.01%

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.74%

-0.10%

-20.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.74%

-0.21%

-20.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-0.26%

-4.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

0.00%

+0.93%

Volatility

INTAX vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Strategic Municipal Income Fund (INTAX) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that INTAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INTAXBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

0.05%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.55%

0.13%

+2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.63%

0.20%

+3.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.68%

0.26%

+5.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.42%

0.26%

+5.16%

INTAX vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

INTAX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

INTAX vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

INTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, less than BIL's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.86%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%0.00%
INTAX
Columbia Strategic Municipal Income Fund
3.77%4.97%3.79%3.08%2.76%2.45%2.46%3.45%3.79%3.76%4.09%4.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


INTAX and BIL have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INTAX has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to BIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTAX dropped -36.87% vs BIL's -0.78%.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.71 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INTAX and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer