PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INTAX vs. FISCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INTAX vs. FISCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Strategic Municipal Income Fund (INTAX) and Franklin Convertible Securities Fund (FISCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTAX achieves a 2.38% return, which is significantly lower than FISCX's 11.36% return. Over the past 10 years, INTAX has underperformed FISCX with an annualized return of 2.26%, while FISCX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.37% annualized return.


INTAX

1D
0.27%
1M
1.08%
YTD
2.38%
6M
2.77%
1Y
8.75%
3Y*
4.69%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*
2.26%

FISCX

1D
0.92%
1M
5.98%
YTD
11.36%
6M
11.31%
1Y
25.06%
3Y*
16.62%
5Y*
4.76%
10Y*
12.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTAX vs. FISCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INTAX
Columbia Strategic Municipal Income Fund
2.38%3.80%3.72%7.92%-14.56%2.65%5.05%8.83%0.51%7.32%
FISCX
Franklin Convertible Securities Fund
11.36%13.63%16.62%9.96%-15.95%-5.70%46.28%33.99%4.15%17.98%

Correlation

The correlation between INTAX and FISCX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 1987

0.03

The correlation between INTAX and FISCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INTAX vs. FISCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTAX
INTAX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
INTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
INTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

FISCX
FISCX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FISCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FISCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTAX vs. FISCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Strategic Municipal Income Fund (INTAX) and Franklin Convertible Securities Fund (FISCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INTAXFISCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.43

2.46

-0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.87

3.39

+0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.44

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

4.03

-1.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.34

16.49

-7.15

INTAX vs. FISCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INTAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the FISCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTAX and FISCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INTAXFISCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

2.46

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.39

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.92

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.81

-0.14

Drawdowns

INTAX vs. FISCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTAX drawdown since its inception was -36.87%, smaller than the maximum FISCX drawdown of -49.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTAX and FISCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INTAXFISCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.87%

-49.16%

+12.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-6.38%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.91%

-12.95%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.74%

-34.37%

+13.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.74%

-34.37%

+13.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-6.91%

+1.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

1.56%

-0.63%

Volatility

INTAX vs. FISCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Strategic Municipal Income Fund (INTAX) is 1.35%, while Franklin Convertible Securities Fund (FISCX) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that INTAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FISCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INTAXFISCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

2.88%

-1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.55%

8.47%

-5.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.63%

10.45%

-6.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.68%

12.40%

-6.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.42%

13.48%

-8.06%

INTAX vs. FISCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

INTAX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than FISCX's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

INTAX vs. FISCX - Dividend Comparison

INTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, less than FISCX's 8.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FISCX
Franklin Convertible Securities Fund
8.89%9.94%4.87%2.22%8.70%8.10%11.30%16.05%7.09%7.68%4.62%4.68%
INTAX
Columbia Strategic Municipal Income Fund
3.77%4.97%3.79%3.08%2.76%2.45%2.46%3.45%3.79%3.76%4.09%4.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


INTAX and FISCX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FISCX has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to INTAX (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTAX dropped -36.87% vs FISCX's -49.16%.

FISCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INTAX and FISCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer