INTA vs. RDFN

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

INTA (Intapp, Inc.) and RDFN (Redfin Corporation) are both stocks. INTA operates in Software - Application (Technology), while RDFN operates in Real Estate - Services (Real Estate). At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

INTA vs. RDFN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intapp, Inc. (INTA) and Redfin Corporation (RDFN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

INTA

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -2.50%
• YTD: -47.14%
• 6M: -43.86%
• 1Y: -58.41%
• 3Y*: -18.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RDFN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTA vs. RDFN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
INTA Intapp, Inc.	-47.14%	-28.51%	68.57%	52.45%	-0.87%	-10.14%
RDFN Redfin Corporation	0.00%	42.19%	-23.74%	143.40%	-88.96%	-39.46%

Correlation

The correlation between INTA and RDFN is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021	0.27

Over the past year, the correlation between INTA and RDFN has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) INTA : $554.34M RDFN : $1.04B
Gross Profit (TTM) INTA : $415.89M RDFN : $364.02M
EBITDA (TTM) INTA : -$30.20M RDFN : -$129.82M

Return for Risk

INTA vs. RDFN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTA

INTA Risk / Return Rank: 6
INTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
INTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
INTA Omega Ratio Rank: 5
INTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
INTA Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTA vs. RDFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intapp, Inc. (INTA) and Redfin Corporation (RDFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INTA	RDFN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.05	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.82	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.79	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.87	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.41	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INTA	RDFN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.05	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.05	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	INTA	RDFN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.17%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-67.17%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-74.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-67.31%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.11%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	41.43%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	INTA	RDFN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.95%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.43%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.94%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.55%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.55%	—	—

Dividends

INTA vs. RDFN - Dividend Comparison

Neither INTA nor RDFN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INTA and RDFN in my portfolio?

INTA and RDFN have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.