INSW vs. PYLD
INSW (International Seaways, Inc.) is a stock, while PYLD (PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund) is Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO. Over the past 3 years, INSW returned 48.78%/yr vs 8.13%/yr for PYLD. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
INSW vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INSW achieves a 97.14% return, which is significantly higher than PYLD's 1.60% return.
INSW
- 1D
- -2.51%
- 1M
- 11.15%
- YTD
- 97.14%
- 6M
- 99.36%
- 1Y
- 164.42%
- 3Y*
- 48.78%
- 5Y*
- 49.22%
- 10Y*
- —
PYLD
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 6.75%
- 3Y*
- 8.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INSW vs. PYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
INSW International Seaways, Inc. | 97.14% | 44.97% | -10.85% | 26.72% |
PYLD PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 1.60% | 9.57% | 7.69% | 5.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between INSW and PYLD is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INSW vs. PYLD — Risk / Return Rank
INSW
PYLD
INSW vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) and PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INSW | PYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.43 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.24 | 2.09 | +8.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.80 | 9.45 | +20.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INSW vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INSW drawdown since its inception was -57.49%, which is greater than PYLD's maximum drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INSW and PYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INSW | PYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.49% | -4.52% | -52.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.16% | -3.25% | -12.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.40% | -4.52% | -45.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.51% | -0.11% | -2.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.84% | -0.64% | -20.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.54% | 0.72% | +4.82% |
Volatility
INSW vs. PYLD - Volatility Comparison
International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) has a higher volatility of 11.02% compared to PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) at 1.07%. This indicates that INSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INSW | PYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.02% | 1.07% | +9.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.40% | 2.62% | +25.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.63% | 3.08% | +33.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.10% | 3.99% | +37.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.28% | 3.99% | +41.29% |
Dividends
INSW vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison
INSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.50%, more than PYLD's 6.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INSW International Seaways, Inc. | 9.50% | 6.04% | 16.05% | 13.83% | 3.84% | 9.26% | 1.47% |
PYLD PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 6.25% | 6.21% | 6.40% | 2.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INSW and PYLD have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INSW has higher volatility (11.02%) compared to PYLD (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INSW dropped -57.49% vs PYLD's -4.52%.
INSW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.55 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INSW and PYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer