INSM vs. BIAHX

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

INSM (Insmed Incorporated) is a stock, while BIAHX (Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund) is Europe Equities fund managed by Brown Advisory Funds. Over the past 10 years, INSM returned 24.09%/yr vs 11.47%/yr for BIAHX. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

INSM vs. BIAHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Insmed Incorporated (INSM) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INSM achieves a -45.89% return, which is significantly lower than BIAHX's -0.17% return. Over the past 10 years, INSM has outperformed BIAHX with an annualized return of 24.09%, while BIAHX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.47% annualized return.

INSM

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -7.08%
• YTD: -45.89%
• 6M: -52.09%
• 1Y: 27.91%
• 3Y*: 68.17%
• 5Y*: 27.84%
• 10Y*: 24.09%

BIAHX

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: -1.33%
• YTD: -0.17%
• 6M: 2.29%
• 1Y: 9.53%
• 3Y*: 21.10%
• 5Y*: 11.80%
• 10Y*: 11.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INSM vs. BIAHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
INSM Insmed Incorporated	-45.89%	152.09%	122.78%	55.11%	-26.65%	-18.17%	39.41%	82.01%	-57.92%	135.68%
BIAHX Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund	-0.17%	47.26%	10.85%	19.36%	-11.95%	14.54%	11.34%	29.43%	-16.60%	32.37%

Correlation

The correlation between INSM and BIAHX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2013	0.27

The correlation between INSM and BIAHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.28 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

INSM vs. BIAHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INSM

INSM Risk / Return Rank: 57
INSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
INSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
INSM Omega Ratio Rank: 62
INSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
INSM Martin Ratio Rank: 55

BIAHX

BIAHX Risk / Return Rank: 9
BIAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
BIAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
BIAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
BIAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
BIAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INSM vs. BIAHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Insmed Incorporated (INSM) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INSM	BIAHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.47	0.67	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.09	1.04	+0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.13	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.51	0.71	-0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.23	2.17	-0.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INSM vs. BIAHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INSM Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is comparable to the BIAHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INSM and BIAHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INSM	BIAHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47	0.67	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.72	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31	0.66	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.02	0.57	-0.60

Drawdowns

INSM vs. BIAHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INSM drawdown since its inception was -98.65%, which is greater than BIAHX's maximum drawdown of -34.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INSM and BIAHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	INSM	BIAHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.65%	-34.90%	-63.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.46%	-13.18%	-42.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-55.46%	-13.18%	-42.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.46%	-30.95%	-24.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.84%	-34.90%	-29.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.46%	-7.86%	-47.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-86.11%	-6.03%	-80.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.66%	4.31%	+18.35%

Volatility

INSM vs. BIAHX - Volatility Comparison

Insmed Incorporated (INSM) has a higher volatility of 18.58% compared to Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX) at 4.46%. This indicates that INSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIAHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INSM	BIAHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.58%	4.46%	+14.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.00%	11.68%	+33.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.24%	14.06%	+45.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.76%	16.38%	+56.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	78.47%	17.30%	+61.17%

Dividends

INSM vs. BIAHX - Dividend Comparison

INSM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BIAHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.61%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BIAHX Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund	7.61%	7.60%	5.16%	1.13%	2.66%	9.72%	6.39%	9.78%	12.12%	0.83%	1.19%
INSM Insmed Incorporated	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INSM and BIAHX in my portfolio?

INSM and BIAHX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INSM or BIAHX?

INSM has higher volatility (18.58%) compared to BIAHX (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INSM dropped -98.65% vs BIAHX's -34.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIAHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.