INRO vs. TOLZ
INRO (Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF) and TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INRO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock, while TOLZ is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. INRO is actively managed, while TOLZ is passively managed. Over the past year, INRO returned 31.46% vs 13.97% for TOLZ. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INRO charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for TOLZ.
Performance
INRO vs. TOLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INRO achieves a 13.22% return, which is significantly higher than TOLZ's 11.31% return.
INRO
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 13.22%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 31.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOLZ
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- 11.31%
- 6M
- 11.51%
- 1Y
- 13.97%
- 3Y*
- 14.17%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.75%
INRO vs. TOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
INRO Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF | 13.22% | 16.67% | 10.88% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 11.31% | 14.76% | 10.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between INRO and TOLZ is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2024 | 0.29 |
The correlation between INRO and TOLZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
INRO vs. TOLZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INRO
TOLZ
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
INRO
TOLZ
Consumer Cyclical
INRO
TOLZ
Communication Services
INRO
TOLZ
-
Financial Services
INRO
TOLZ
Industrials
INRO
TOLZ
Healthcare
INRO
TOLZ
-
Consumer Defensive
INRO
TOLZ
Energy
INRO
TOLZ
Basic Materials
INRO
TOLZ
-
Real Estate
INRO
TOLZ
Utilities
INRO
TOLZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INRO vs. TOLZ — Risk / Return Rank
INRO
TOLZ
INRO vs. TOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INRO | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.23 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.38 | 2.71 | +0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.71 | 8.20 | +7.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INRO | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 1.36 | +1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 0.41 | +0.71 |
Drawdowns
INRO vs. TOLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INRO drawdown since its inception was -20.02%, smaller than the maximum TOLZ drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INRO and TOLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INRO | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.02% | -39.33% | +19.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -5.18% | -4.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -3.13% | +2.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.61% | -6.63% | +4.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 1.71% | +0.30% |
Volatility
INRO vs. TOLZ - Volatility Comparison
Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) at 3.37%. This indicates that INRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TOLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INRO | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | 3.37% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 8.20% | +1.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.83% | 10.29% | +2.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.10% | 13.99% | +3.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.10% | 16.29% | +0.81% |
INRO vs. TOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
INRO has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than TOLZ's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
INRO vs. TOLZ - Dividend Comparison
INRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than TOLZ's 3.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INRO Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF | 0.65% | 0.68% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.66% | 3.99% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 3.16% | 2.96% | 3.63% | 3.30% | 2.62% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INRO and TOLZ have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INRO has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to TOLZ (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INRO dropped -20.02% vs TOLZ's -39.33%.
On 1-year performance, INRO leads with 31.46% vs 13.97% for TOLZ. On fees, INRO is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, INRO has performed better with a 31.46% return vs 13.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INRO is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for TOLZ.
TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 0.65% for INRO.
INRO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TOLZ is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for INRO and 0.46% for TOLZ.
INRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INRO and TOLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer