PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INRO vs. CLOA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

INRO vs. CLOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) and BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

INRO vs. CLOA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
INRO
Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF
-4.40%16.67%10.88%
CLOA
BlackRock AAA CLO ETF
0.94%5.44%5.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INRO achieves a -4.40% return, which is significantly lower than CLOA's 0.94% return.


INRO

1D
3.22%
1M
-4.68%
YTD
-4.40%
6M
-2.68%
1Y
18.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CLOA

1D
0.04%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.94%
6M
2.27%
1Y
5.47%
3Y*
6.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


INRO vs. CLOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

INRO has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOA's 0.20% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

INRO vs. CLOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INRO
INRO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
INRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
INRO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
INRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
INRO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

CLOA
CLOA Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CLOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INRO vs. CLOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) and BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INROCLOADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.98

3.34

-2.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.49

4.54

-3.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

2.22

-0.99

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

5.01

-3.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.19

36.22

-29.03

INRO vs. CLOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the CLOA Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INRO and CLOA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INROCLOADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

3.34

-2.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

5.12

-4.47

Correlation

The correlation between INRO and CLOA is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

INRO vs. CLOA - Dividend Comparison

INRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than CLOA's 5.21% yield.


TTM202520242023
INRO
Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF
0.77%0.68%0.50%0.00%
CLOA
BlackRock AAA CLO ETF
5.21%5.35%6.01%5.88%

Drawdowns

INRO vs. CLOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INRO drawdown since its inception was -20.02%, which is greater than CLOA's maximum drawdown of -1.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INRO and CLOA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


INROCLOADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.02%

-1.34%

-18.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.37%

-1.10%

-11.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.45%

-0.04%

-6.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.75%

-0.06%

-2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

0.15%

+2.48%

Volatility

INRO vs. CLOA - Volatility Comparison

Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA) at 0.27%. This indicates that INRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


INROCLOADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

0.27%

+5.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.16%

0.51%

+9.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.69%

1.64%

+17.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.37%

1.35%

+16.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.37%

1.35%

+16.02%