PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INR vs. HAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

INR vs. HAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Infinity Natural Resources, Inc (INR) and VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

INR vs. HAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
INR
Infinity Natural Resources, Inc
19.55%-30.09%
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
20.50%28.49%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with INR having a 19.55% return and HAP slightly higher at 20.50%.


INR

1D
-4.55%
1M
6.08%
YTD
19.55%
6M
34.32%
1Y
-6.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HAP

1D
2.33%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
20.50%
6M
29.86%
1Y
48.82%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
12.99%
10Y*
12.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INR vs. HAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INR
INR Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
INR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
INR Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
INR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
INR Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

HAP
HAP Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
HAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
HAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INR vs. HAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Infinity Natural Resources, Inc (INR) and VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INRHAPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.12

2.59

-2.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.18

3.21

-3.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.51

-0.49

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.05

3.60

-3.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.09

18.89

-18.97

INR vs. HAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INR Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the HAP Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INR and HAP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INRHAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

2.59

-2.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.29

0.26

-0.55

Correlation

The correlation between INR and HAP is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

INR vs. HAP - Dividend Comparison

INR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INR
Infinity Natural Resources, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
1.88%2.27%2.65%3.27%3.28%2.16%2.45%2.80%2.85%2.02%1.99%3.00%

Drawdowns

INR vs. HAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INR drawdown since its inception was -48.84%, roughly equal to the maximum HAP drawdown of -50.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INR and HAP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


INRHAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.84%

-50.73%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.74%

-13.64%

-29.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.55%

-2.61%

-16.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.49%

-12.13%

-16.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.18%

2.60%

+21.58%

Volatility

INR vs. HAP - Volatility Comparison

Infinity Natural Resources, Inc (INR) has a higher volatility of 14.40% compared to VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) at 6.40%. This indicates that INR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


INRHAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.40%

6.40%

+8.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.40%

12.48%

+20.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.89%

18.94%

+31.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.77%

18.30%

+31.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.77%

19.81%

+29.96%