PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INR vs. CNRG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INR vs. CNRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Infinity Natural Resources, Inc (INR) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INR achieves a -11.20% return, which is significantly lower than CNRG's 7.93% return.


INR

1D
1.71%
1M
1.87%
6M
-5.35%
YTD
-11.20%
1Y
-12.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CNRG

1D
-4.28%
1M
-11.93%
6M
-1.18%
YTD
7.93%
1Y
51.59%
3Y*
4.59%
5Y*
1.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INR vs. CNRG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
INR
Infinity Natural Resources, Inc
-11.20%-33.53%
CNRG
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF
7.93%47.39%

Correlation

The correlation between INR and CNRG is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2025

0.03

The correlation between INR and CNRG shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INR vs. CNRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INR
INR Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
INR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
INR Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
INR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
INR Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

CNRG
CNRG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
CNRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNRG Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CNRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNRG Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INR vs. CNRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Infinity Natural Resources, Inc (INR) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INRCNRGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.23

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.34

2.23

-2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.72

6.04

-6.76

INR vs. CNRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INR Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the CNRG Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INR and CNRG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INR vs. CNRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INR drawdown since its inception was -49.46%, smaller than the maximum CNRG drawdown of -68.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INR and CNRG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INRCNRGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.46%

-68.49%

+19.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.35%

-23.26%

-13.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.97%

-29.82%

-11.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.29%

-31.66%

+1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.26%

8.56%

+8.70%

Volatility

INR vs. CNRG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Infinity Natural Resources, Inc (INR) is 10.78%, while SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) has a volatility of 12.63%. This indicates that INR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INRCNRGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.78%

12.63%

-1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.96%

28.37%

+5.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.97%

39.02%

+7.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.23%

34.67%

+14.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.23%

36.05%

+13.18%

Dividends

INR vs. CNRG - Dividend Comparison

INR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CNRG
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF
1.27%1.46%1.34%1.17%1.23%1.34%0.69%1.16%0.35%
INR
Infinity Natural Resources, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INR and CNRG have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNRG has higher volatility (12.63%) compared to INR (10.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INR dropped -49.46% vs CNRG's -68.49%.

CNRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INR and CNRG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer