INPIX vs. UGPIX
INPIX (ProFunds Internet UltraSector Fund) and UGPIX (ProFunds UltraChina) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, INPIX returned 22.10%/yr vs 6.96%/yr for UGPIX. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INPIX charges 1.48%/yr vs 1.74%/yr for UGPIX.
Performance
INPIX vs. UGPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INPIX achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly higher than UGPIX's -37.93% return. Over the past 10 years, INPIX has outperformed UGPIX with an annualized return of 22.10%, while UGPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.96% annualized return.
INPIX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 6.46%
- 6M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 2.14%
- 3Y*
- 21.93%
- 5Y*
- -4.10%
- 10Y*
- 22.10%
UGPIX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- 6M
- -46.85%
- YTD
- -37.93%
- 1Y
- -28.33%
- 3Y*
- -13.55%
- 5Y*
- 2.49%
- 10Y*
- 6.96%
INPIX vs. UGPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INPIX ProFunds Internet UltraSector Fund | 1.29% | 9.88% | 41.50% | 76.21% | -63.24% | -1.09% | 254.85% | 25.95% | 4.78% | 44.61% |
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina | -37.93% | 36.28% | -21.79% | 785.09% | -53.03% | -73.86% | 76.47% | 40.07% | -46.51% | 105.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between INPIX and UGPIX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2000 | 0.16 |
Over the past year, INPIX and UGPIX have become more correlated (0.42) than their long-term average of 0.16, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INPIX vs. UGPIX — Risk / Return Rank
INPIX
UGPIX
INPIX vs. UGPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Internet UltraSector Fund (INPIX) and ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INPIX | UGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.94 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | -0.44 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.08 | -0.84 | +0.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INPIX vs. UGPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INPIX drawdown since its inception was -95.64%, roughly equal to the maximum UGPIX drawdown of -98.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INPIX and UGPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INPIX | UGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.64% | -98.56% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.04% | -65.51% | +33.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.68% | -65.51% | +29.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.41% | -91.09% | +17.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.41% | -96.22% | +22.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.46% | -82.34% | +61.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.14% | -79.76% | +33.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.98% | 34.41% | -20.43% |
Volatility
INPIX vs. UGPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProFunds Internet UltraSector Fund (INPIX) is 10.09%, while ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) has a volatility of 15.53%. This indicates that INPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INPIX | UGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.09% | 15.53% | -5.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.94% | 38.06% | -14.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.91% | 53.17% | -23.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.26% | 387.98% | -346.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.69% | 276.45% | -226.76% |
INPIX vs. UGPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
INPIX has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is lower than UGPIX's 1.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
INPIX vs. UGPIX - Dividend Comparison
INPIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UGPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INPIX ProFunds Internet UltraSector Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.45% | 21.43% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 6.69% |
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina | 9.74% | 6.05% | 2.91% | 3.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INPIX and UGPIX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGPIX has higher volatility (15.53%) compared to INPIX (10.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INPIX dropped -95.64% vs UGPIX's -98.56%.
INPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.04 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INPIX and UGPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer