PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INPFX vs. TIBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

INPFX vs. TIBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

INPFX vs. TIBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INPFX
American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1
-1.32%14.29%9.20%9.46%-8.74%12.90%5.67%15.76%-3.57%11.43%
TIBIX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I
8.00%37.01%13.48%18.28%-7.69%20.36%-0.40%18.01%-4.31%15.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INPFX achieves a -1.32% return, which is significantly lower than TIBIX's 8.00% return. Over the past 10 years, INPFX has underperformed TIBIX with an annualized return of 6.84%, while TIBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.99% annualized return.


INPFX

1D
0.07%
1M
-5.13%
YTD
-1.32%
6M
0.78%
1Y
9.95%
3Y*
9.75%
5Y*
5.98%
10Y*
6.84%

TIBIX

1D
0.34%
1M
-4.84%
YTD
8.00%
6M
15.48%
1Y
36.10%
3Y*
23.52%
5Y*
15.26%
10Y*
11.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


INPFX vs. TIBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

INPFX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than TIBIX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

INPFX vs. TIBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INPFX
INPFX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
INPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
INPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
INPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
INPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

TIBIX
TIBIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TIBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
TIBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INPFX vs. TIBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INPFXTIBIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.36

3.35

-1.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.89

4.27

-2.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.74

-0.46

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

4.14

-2.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.91

20.50

-13.59

INPFX vs. TIBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INPFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the TIBIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INPFX and TIBIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INPFXTIBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

3.35

-1.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

1.38

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.89

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.74

+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between INPFX and TIBIX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

INPFX vs. TIBIX - Dividend Comparison

INPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, more than TIBIX's 5.49% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INPFX
American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1
5.61%5.61%5.15%4.76%4.84%4.38%5.54%4.53%4.79%3.25%3.53%3.85%
TIBIX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I
5.49%5.83%5.67%4.89%5.89%5.33%4.31%4.46%4.77%4.52%4.14%4.66%

Drawdowns

INPFX vs. TIBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INPFX drawdown since its inception was -21.31%, smaller than the maximum TIBIX drawdown of -48.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INPFX and TIBIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


INPFXTIBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.31%

-48.88%

+27.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.25%

-8.58%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.37%

-20.79%

+5.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.31%

-34.85%

+13.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.13%

-5.07%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.32%

-6.00%

+3.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

1.73%

-0.33%

Volatility

INPFX vs. TIBIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX) is 2.46%, while Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX) has a volatility of 3.22%. This indicates that INPFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


INPFXTIBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

3.22%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.38%

6.38%

-2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.55%

10.73%

-3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.48%

11.09%

-3.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.34%

13.47%

-5.13%