PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INOV vs. NBOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INOV vs. NBOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November (INOV) and Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF (NBOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INOV achieves a 5.40% return, which is significantly lower than NBOS's 6.51% return.


INOV

1D
-0.34%
1M
2.31%
YTD
5.40%
6M
7.23%
1Y
14.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NBOS

1D
-0.16%
1M
2.06%
YTD
6.51%
6M
7.94%
1Y
19.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INOV vs. NBOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between INOV and NBOS is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024

0.62

The correlation between INOV and NBOS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INOV vs. NBOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INOV
INOV Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
INOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
INOV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
INOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
INOV Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

NBOS
NBOS Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
NBOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBOS Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NBOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBOS Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INOV vs. NBOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November (INOV) and Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF (NBOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INOVNBOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.55

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

4.09

-2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.08

23.25

-15.17

INOV vs. NBOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is lower than the NBOS Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INOV and NBOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INOVNBOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

2.58

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.82

1.29

+0.53

Drawdowns

INOV vs. NBOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INOV drawdown since its inception was -8.01%, smaller than the maximum NBOS drawdown of -12.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INOV and NBOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INOVNBOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.01%

-12.66%

+4.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.24%

-4.71%

-2.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-0.17%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.89%

-1.10%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

0.83%

+0.97%

Volatility

INOV vs. NBOS - Volatility Comparison

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November (INOV) has a higher volatility of 2.96% compared to Neuberger Berman Option Strategy ETF (NBOS) at 0.84%. This indicates that INOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INOVNBOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

0.84%

+2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.71%

5.90%

+1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.69%

7.47%

+1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.56%

9.96%

-1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.56%

9.96%

-1.40%

INOV vs. NBOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

INOV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than NBOS's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

INOV vs. NBOS - Dividend Comparison

INOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NBOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.93%.


Frequently Asked Questions


INOV and NBOS have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INOV has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to NBOS (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INOV dropped -8.01% vs NBOS's -12.66%.

On 1-year performance, NBOS leads with 19.19% vs 14.54% for INOV. On fees, NBOS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, NBOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NBOS has performed better with a 19.19% return vs 14.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NBOS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for INOV.

NBOS has the higher dividend yield at 7.93%, compared with 0.00% for INOV.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Neuberger Berman. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for INOV and 0.56% for NBOS.

NBOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INOV and NBOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer