PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INOD vs. RMBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INOD vs. RMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innodata Inc. (INOD) and Rambus Inc. (RMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INOD achieves a 98.04% return, which is significantly higher than RMBS's 59.50% return. Over the past 10 years, INOD has outperformed RMBS with an annualized return of 45.64%, while RMBS has yielded a comparatively lower 28.27% annualized return.


INOD

1D
-4.23%
1M
12.17%
YTD
98.04%
6M
92.56%
1Y
137.86%
3Y*
114.32%
5Y*
69.37%
10Y*
45.64%

RMBS

1D
1.45%
1M
8.68%
YTD
59.50%
6M
55.53%
1Y
141.61%
3Y*
32.27%
5Y*
49.08%
10Y*
28.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INOD vs. RMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INOD
Innodata Inc.
98.04%28.92%385.50%174.54%-49.92%11.70%364.91%-24.00%10.29%-44.49%
RMBS
Rambus Inc.
59.50%73.84%-22.55%90.54%21.88%68.33%26.75%79.60%-46.06%3.27%

Correlation

The correlation between INOD and RMBS is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 1997

0.15

Over the past year, INOD and RMBS have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.15, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INOD:

$3.59B

RMBS:

$16.08B

EPS

INOD:

$1.11

RMBS:

$2.11

PE Ratio

INOD:

90.91

RMBS:

69.62

PEG Ratio

INOD:

0.02

RMBS:

0.15

PS Ratio

INOD:

12.60

RMBS:

22.20

PB Ratio

INOD:

28.00

RMBS:

11.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

INOD:

$283.42M

RMBS:

$721.16M

Gross Profit (TTM)

INOD:

$76.88M

RMBS:

$555.52M

EBITDA (TTM)

INOD:

$37.35M

RMBS:

$298.07M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INOD vs. RMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INOD
INOD Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
INOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
INOD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
INOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
INOD Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

RMBS
RMBS Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
RMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
RMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INOD vs. RMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innodata Inc. (INOD) and Rambus Inc. (RMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INODRMBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.32

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

3.88

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.97

9.73

-5.75

INOD vs. RMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INOD Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the RMBS Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INOD and RMBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INOD vs. RMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INOD drawdown since its inception was -95.47%, roughly equal to the maximum RMBS drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INOD and RMBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INODRMBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.47%

-97.16%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.03%

-36.69%

-26.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.03%

-48.83%

-14.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.44%

-48.83%

-25.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.44%

-52.95%

-21.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.95%

-14.12%

-2.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.07%

-74.88%

+14.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.83%

14.62%

+20.21%

Volatility

INOD vs. RMBS - Volatility Comparison

Innodata Inc. (INOD) has a higher volatility of 32.31% compared to Rambus Inc. (RMBS) at 28.11%. This indicates that INOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INODRMBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.31%

28.11%

+4.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

89.40%

62.19%

+27.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

122.08%

76.00%

+46.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

106.74%

55.40%

+51.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.36%

46.30%

+43.06%

Dividends

INOD vs. RMBS - Dividend Comparison

Neither INOD nor RMBS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

INOD vs. RMBS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Innodata Inc. and Rambus Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
90.10M
180.19M
(INOD) Total Revenue
(RMBS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

INOD vs. RMBS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Innodata Inc. and Rambus Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
79.7%
Portfolio components
INOD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Innodata Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 90.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

RMBS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rambus Inc. reported a gross profit of 143.66M and revenue of 180.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.7%.

INOD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Innodata Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 90.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

RMBS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rambus Inc. reported an operating income of 61.76M and revenue of 180.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.3%.

INOD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Innodata Inc. reported a net income of 14.90M and revenue of 90.10M, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.

RMBS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rambus Inc. reported a net income of 59.86M and revenue of 180.19M, resulting in a net margin of 33.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


INOD and RMBS have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INOD has higher volatility (32.31%) compared to RMBS (28.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INOD dropped -95.47% vs RMBS's -97.16%.

RMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INOD and RMBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer