PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INOD vs. IESC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INOD vs. IESC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innodata Inc. (INOD) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INOD achieves a 101.75% return, which is significantly higher than IESC's 88.91% return. Over the past 10 years, INOD has underperformed IESC with an annualized return of 46.16%, while IESC has yielded a comparatively higher 48.95% annualized return.


INOD

1D
0.80%
1M
21.09%
YTD
101.75%
6M
78.55%
1Y
100.64%
3Y*
114.06%
5Y*
70.61%
10Y*
46.16%

IESC

1D
1.97%
1M
10.23%
YTD
88.91%
6M
66.06%
1Y
162.49%
3Y*
140.27%
5Y*
69.06%
10Y*
48.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INOD vs. IESC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INOD
Innodata Inc.
101.75%28.92%385.50%174.54%-49.92%11.70%364.91%-24.00%10.29%-44.49%
IESC
IES Holdings, Inc.
88.91%93.58%153.67%122.72%-29.76%9.99%79.42%65.02%-9.86%-9.92%

Correlation

The correlation between INOD and IESC is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 1998

0.11

Over the past year, INOD and IESC have become more correlated (0.38) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INOD:

$3.66B

IESC:

$14.83B

EPS

INOD:

$1.11

IESC:

$18.85

PE Ratio

INOD:

92.61

IESC:

38.98

PEG Ratio

INOD:

0.02

IESC:

0.47

PS Ratio

INOD:

12.84

IESC:

4.08

PB Ratio

INOD:

28.53

IESC:

13.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

INOD:

$283.42M

IESC:

$3.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

INOD:

$76.88M

IESC:

$931.31M

EBITDA (TTM)

INOD:

$37.35M

IESC:

$487.14M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INOD vs. IESC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INOD
INOD Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
INOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
INOD Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
INOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
INOD Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

IESC
IESC Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
IESC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IESC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
IESC Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
IESC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IESC Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INOD vs. IESC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innodata Inc. (INOD) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INODIESCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.39

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

7.50

-5.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.90

21.33

-18.43

INOD vs. IESC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INOD Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the IESC Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INOD and IESC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INODIESCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

2.64

-1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

1.29

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

1.02

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.05

+0.07

Drawdowns

INOD vs. IESC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INOD drawdown since its inception was -95.47%, roughly equal to the maximum IESC drawdown of -98.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INOD and IESC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INODIESCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.47%

-98.32%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.03%

-21.80%

-41.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.03%

-49.23%

-13.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.44%

-54.22%

-20.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.44%

-54.28%

-20.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.40%

-0.97%

-14.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.09%

-55.01%

-5.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.88%

7.66%

+27.22%

Volatility

INOD vs. IESC - Volatility Comparison

Innodata Inc. (INOD) has a higher volatility of 72.66% compared to IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) at 11.77%. This indicates that INOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IESC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INODIESCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

72.66%

11.77%

+60.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

89.14%

49.79%

+39.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

122.75%

62.06%

+60.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

106.73%

53.94%

+52.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.38%

48.10%

+41.28%

Dividends

INOD vs. IESC - Dividend Comparison

Neither INOD nor IESC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

INOD vs. IESC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Innodata Inc. and IES Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
90.10M
974.20M
(INOD) Total Revenue
(IESC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

INOD vs. IESC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Innodata Inc. and IES Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%202220232024202520260
24.5%
Portfolio components
INOD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Innodata Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 90.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

IESC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 238.70M and revenue of 974.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.

INOD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Innodata Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 90.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

IESC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 112.30M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

INOD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Innodata Inc. reported a net income of 14.90M and revenue of 90.10M, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.

IESC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 110.00M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


INOD and IESC have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INOD has higher volatility (72.66%) compared to IESC (11.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INOD dropped -95.47% vs IESC's -98.32%.

IESC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INOD and IESC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer