PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INOD vs. AUSF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INOD vs. AUSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innodata Inc. (INOD) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INOD achieves a 24.16% return, which is significantly higher than AUSF's 13.25% return.


INOD

1D
0.68%
1M
-8.16%
6M
14.64%
YTD
24.16%
1Y
40.72%
3Y*
75.07%
5Y*
55.27%
10Y*
38.20%
ALL TIME*
11.62%

AUSF

1D
0.58%
1M
3.89%
6M
7.66%
YTD
13.25%
1Y
20.82%
3Y*
19.83%
5Y*
14.70%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.41M$2.26M$3.94M
$60.35M$61.63M$172.10M

INOD vs. AUSF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
INOD
Innodata Inc.
24.16%28.92%385.50%174.54%-49.92%11.70%364.91%-24.00%17.19%
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
13.25%13.69%16.05%22.26%-0.18%27.48%1.27%24.06%-11.18%

Correlation

The correlation between INOD and AUSF is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2018

0.24

The correlation between INOD and AUSF shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INOD vs. AUSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

INOD
INOD Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
INOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
INOD Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
INOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
INOD Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

AUSF
AUSF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
AUSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUSF Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
AUSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUSF Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

INOD vs. AUSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innodata Inc. (INOD) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INODAUSFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.35

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

3.58

-2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.09

10.47

-9.37

INOD vs. AUSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INOD Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the AUSF Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INOD and AUSF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INOD vs. AUSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INOD drawdown since its inception was -95.47%, which is greater than AUSF's maximum drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INOD and AUSF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INODAUSFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.47%

-44.25%

-51.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.03%

-5.84%

-57.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.03%

-12.29%

-50.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.44%

-14.23%

-60.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.93%

-1.05%

-46.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.99%

-4.15%

-55.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.34%

1.99%

+35.35%

Volatility

INOD vs. AUSF - Volatility Comparison

Innodata Inc. (INOD) has a higher volatility of 19.03% compared to Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) at 3.58%. This indicates that INOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INODAUSFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.03%

3.58%

+15.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

87.58%

7.47%

+80.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

120.21%

10.42%

+109.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

107.26%

13.62%

+93.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.74%

18.96%

+70.78%

Dividends

INOD vs. AUSF - Dividend Comparison

INOD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AUSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
2.60%2.78%2.63%1.83%2.51%2.22%2.95%4.02%1.46%
INOD
Innodata Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INOD and AUSF have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INOD has higher volatility (19.03%) compared to AUSF (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INOD dropped -95.47% vs AUSF's -44.25%.

AUSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INOD and AUSF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer