INMU vs. TSCM

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

INMU (BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF) and TSCM (TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INMU is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by BlackRock, while TSCM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TimesSquare Capital Management. Both are actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INMU charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TSCM.

Performance

INMU vs. TSCM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF (INMU) and TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INMU achieves a 2.15% return, which is significantly lower than TSCM's 2.68% return.

INMU

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 1.58%
• YTD: 2.15%
• 6M: 2.28%
• 1Y: 7.07%
• 3Y*: 4.66%
• 5Y*: 1.88%
• 10Y*: —

TSCM

• 1D: -1.29%
• 1M: 3.17%
• YTD: 2.68%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INMU vs. TSCM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
INMU BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF	2.15%	-0.21%
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF	2.68%	-1.32%

Correlation

The correlation between INMU and TSCM is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025	0.39

Return for Risk

INMU vs. TSCM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INMU

INMU Risk / Return Rank: 81
INMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
INMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
INMU Omega Ratio Rank: 95
INMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
INMU Martin Ratio Rank: 59

TSCM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INMU vs. TSCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF (INMU) and TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INMU	TSCM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.87	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.25	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.65	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.26	—	—

Drawdowns

INMU vs. TSCM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INMU drawdown since its inception was -10.67%, smaller than the maximum TSCM drawdown of -14.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INMU and TSCM.

Drawdown Indicators

	INMU	TSCM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.67%	-14.87%	+4.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	-1.52%	+1.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.78%	-5.79%	+3.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.77%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	INMU	TSCM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.67%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.91%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48%	21.15%	-18.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.61%	21.15%	-17.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.53%	21.15%	-17.62%

INMU vs. TSCM - Expense Ratio Comparison

INMU has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than TSCM's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

INMU vs. TSCM - Dividend Comparison

INMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, while TSCM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
INMU BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF	3.34%	3.48%	3.47%	3.44%	1.92%	1.14%
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INMU and TSCM in my portfolio?

INMU and TSCM have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, INMU or TSCM?

On fees, INMU is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, INMU or TSCM?

INMU is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TSCM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INMU or TSCM?

INMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 0.00% for TSCM.

What is the main difference between INMU and TSCM?

INMU is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while TSCM is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and TimesSquare Capital Management. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for INMU and 0.55% for TSCM.