PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INKM vs. JFLI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INKM vs. JFLI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) and JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INKM achieves a 5.61% return, which is significantly lower than JFLI's 9.90% return.


INKM

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.93%
YTD
5.61%
6M
5.74%
1Y
13.00%
3Y*
10.04%
5Y*
3.96%
10Y*
5.59%

JFLI

1D
-0.32%
1M
3.80%
YTD
9.90%
6M
9.51%
1Y
21.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INKM vs. JFLI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
INKM
SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF
5.61%9.15%
JFLI
JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF
9.90%9.49%

Correlation

The correlation between INKM and JFLI is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025

0.77

The correlation between INKM and JFLI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

INKM vs. JFLI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INKM
JFLI

Industrials

14.6%
7.8%

Utilities

13.9%
6.5%

Technology

13.2%
28.4%

Energy

11.1%
5.0%

Real Estate

10.9%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.6%
8.1%

Financial Services

8.3%
10.4%

Healthcare

6.8%
7.2%

Communication Services

6.2%
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%
9.3%

Basic Materials

1.4%
3.1%

Industrials

INKM
14.6%
JFLI
7.8%

Utilities

INKM
13.9%
JFLI
6.5%

Technology

INKM
13.2%
JFLI
28.4%

Energy

INKM
11.1%
JFLI
5.0%

Real Estate

INKM
10.9%
JFLI
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

INKM
8.6%
JFLI
8.1%

Financial Services

INKM
8.3%
JFLI
10.4%

Healthcare

INKM
6.8%
JFLI
7.2%

Communication Services

INKM
6.2%
JFLI
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

INKM
5.1%
JFLI
9.3%

Basic Materials

INKM
1.4%
JFLI
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INKM vs. JFLI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INKM
INKM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
INKM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INKM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
INKM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
INKM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
INKM Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

JFLI
JFLI Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
JFLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JFLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
JFLI Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
JFLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
JFLI Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INKM vs. JFLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) and JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INKMJFLIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.48

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

3.17

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.30

15.34

-4.04

INKM vs. JFLI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INKM Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the JFLI Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INKM and JFLI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INKMJFLIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

2.53

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

1.29

-0.72

Drawdowns

INKM vs. JFLI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INKM drawdown since its inception was -28.58%, which is greater than JFLI's maximum drawdown of -12.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INKM and JFLI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INKMJFLIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.58%

-12.87%

-15.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.55%

-6.67%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-0.32%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-1.44%

-2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

1.38%

-0.23%

Volatility

INKM vs. JFLI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) is 1.67%, while JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI) has a volatility of 2.35%. This indicates that INKM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JFLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INKMJFLIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.67%

2.35%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.59%

6.93%

-2.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.95%

8.39%

-2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.30%

11.90%

-3.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.78%

11.90%

-2.12%

INKM vs. JFLI - Expense Ratio Comparison

INKM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than JFLI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

INKM vs. JFLI - Dividend Comparison

INKM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, less than JFLI's 7.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INKM
SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF
4.86%5.82%4.83%4.56%5.03%3.74%3.88%4.38%4.08%3.10%3.39%3.45%
JFLI
JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF
7.18%6.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INKM and JFLI have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JFLI has higher volatility (2.35%) compared to INKM (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INKM dropped -28.58% vs JFLI's -12.87%.

On 1-year performance, JFLI leads with 21.09% vs 13.00% for INKM. On fees, JFLI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, INKM has been the lower-risk option at 1.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JFLI has performed better with a 21.09% return vs 13.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JFLI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for INKM.

JFLI has the higher dividend yield at 7.18%, compared with 4.86% for INKM.

INKM is categorized as Global Equities, while JFLI is Global Allocation. They also come from different issuers: State Street and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for INKM and 0.35% for JFLI.

JFLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INKM and JFLI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer