INKM vs. JFLI
INKM (SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF) and JFLI (JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INKM is a Global Equities fund actively managed by State Street, while JFLI is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, INKM returned 13.00% vs 21.09% for JFLI. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INKM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JFLI.
Performance
INKM vs. JFLI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INKM achieves a 5.61% return, which is significantly lower than JFLI's 9.90% return.
INKM
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 5.61%
- 6M
- 5.74%
- 1Y
- 13.00%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.96%
- 10Y*
- 5.59%
JFLI
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 3.80%
- YTD
- 9.90%
- 6M
- 9.51%
- 1Y
- 21.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INKM vs. JFLI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF | 5.61% | 9.15% |
JFLI JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF | 9.90% | 9.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between INKM and JFLI is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025 | 0.77 |
The correlation between INKM and JFLI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
INKM vs. JFLI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INKM
JFLI
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
Energy
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Industrials
INKM
JFLI
Utilities
INKM
JFLI
Technology
INKM
JFLI
Energy
INKM
JFLI
Real Estate
INKM
JFLI
Consumer Defensive
INKM
JFLI
Financial Services
INKM
JFLI
Healthcare
INKM
JFLI
Communication Services
INKM
JFLI
Consumer Cyclical
INKM
JFLI
Basic Materials
INKM
JFLI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INKM vs. JFLI — Risk / Return Rank
INKM
JFLI
INKM vs. JFLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) and JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INKM | JFLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.48 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 3.17 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.30 | 15.34 | -4.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INKM | JFLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 2.53 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 1.29 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
INKM vs. JFLI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INKM drawdown since its inception was -28.58%, which is greater than JFLI's maximum drawdown of -12.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INKM and JFLI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INKM | JFLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.58% | -12.87% | -15.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.55% | -6.67% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -0.32% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.69% | -1.44% | -2.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.15% | 1.38% | -0.23% |
Volatility
INKM vs. JFLI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) is 1.67%, while JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI) has a volatility of 2.35%. This indicates that INKM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JFLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INKM | JFLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.67% | 2.35% | -0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.59% | 6.93% | -2.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.95% | 8.39% | -2.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.30% | 11.90% | -3.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.78% | 11.90% | -2.12% |
INKM vs. JFLI - Expense Ratio Comparison
INKM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than JFLI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
INKM vs. JFLI - Dividend Comparison
INKM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, less than JFLI's 7.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF | 4.86% | 5.82% | 4.83% | 4.56% | 5.03% | 3.74% | 3.88% | 4.38% | 4.08% | 3.10% | 3.39% | 3.45% |
JFLI JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF | 7.18% | 6.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INKM and JFLI have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JFLI has higher volatility (2.35%) compared to INKM (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INKM dropped -28.58% vs JFLI's -12.87%.
On 1-year performance, JFLI leads with 21.09% vs 13.00% for INKM. On fees, JFLI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, INKM has been the lower-risk option at 1.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, JFLI has performed better with a 21.09% return vs 13.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JFLI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for INKM.
JFLI has the higher dividend yield at 7.18%, compared with 4.86% for INKM.
INKM is categorized as Global Equities, while JFLI is Global Allocation. They also come from different issuers: State Street and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for INKM and 0.35% for JFLI.
JFLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INKM and JFLI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer