INKM vs. AVTM
INKM (SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF) and AVTM (Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INKM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for AVTM.
Performance
INKM vs. AVTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
INKM
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 5.61%
- 6M
- 5.74%
- 1Y
- 13.00%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.96%
- 10Y*
- 5.59%
AVTM
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INKM vs. AVTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF | 2.93% |
AVTM Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF | 9.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between INKM and AVTM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026 | 0.75 |
INKM vs. AVTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INKM
AVTM
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
Energy
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Industrials
INKM
AVTM
Utilities
INKM
AVTM
Technology
INKM
AVTM
Energy
INKM
AVTM
Real Estate
INKM
AVTM
Consumer Defensive
INKM
AVTM
Financial Services
INKM
AVTM
Healthcare
INKM
AVTM
Communication Services
INKM
AVTM
Consumer Cyclical
INKM
AVTM
Basic Materials
INKM
AVTM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INKM vs. AVTM — Risk / Return Rank
INKM
AVTM
INKM vs. AVTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) and Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF (AVTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INKM | AVTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.30 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INKM | AVTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 1.88 | -1.31 |
Drawdowns
INKM vs. AVTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INKM drawdown since its inception was -28.58%, which is greater than AVTM's maximum drawdown of -9.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INKM and AVTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INKM | AVTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.58% | -9.21% | -19.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -0.65% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.69% | -2.08% | -1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.15% | — | — |
Volatility
INKM vs. AVTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INKM | AVTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.67% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.59% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.95% | 15.88% | -9.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.30% | 15.88% | -7.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.78% | 15.88% | -6.10% |
INKM vs. AVTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
INKM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AVTM's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
INKM vs. AVTM - Dividend Comparison
INKM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, more than AVTM's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVTM Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF | 4.86% | 5.82% | 4.83% | 4.56% | 5.03% | 3.74% | 3.88% | 4.38% | 4.08% | 3.10% | 3.39% | 3.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INKM and AVTM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVTM is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVTM is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for INKM.
INKM has the higher dividend yield at 4.86%, compared with 0.08% for AVTM.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for INKM and 0.22% for AVTM.
Find the right allocation for INKM and AVTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer