PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INGR vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INGR vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INGR achieves a -4.81% return, which is significantly higher than T's -7.04% return. Over the past 10 years, INGR has underperformed T with an annualized return of 0.06%, while T has yielded a comparatively higher 2.10% annualized return.


INGR

1D
-0.04%
1M
5.60%
6M
-9.34%
YTD
-4.81%
1Y
-20.64%
3Y*
0.57%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
0.06%
ALL TIME*
9.13%

T

1D
0.64%
1M
2.62%
6M
-2.84%
YTD
-7.04%
1Y
-13.37%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
2.10%
ALL TIME*
9.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INGR vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INGR
Ingredion Incorporated
-4.81%-17.86%29.22%14.08%4.47%26.35%-12.55%4.70%-33.10%13.87%
T
AT&T Inc.
-7.04%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between INGR and T is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 1997

0.29

The correlation between INGR and T shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.36 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INGR:

$6.46B

T:

$152.52B

EPS

INGR:

$15.76

T:

$3.05

PE Ratio

INGR:

6.50

T:

7.19

PEG Ratio

INGR:

0.07

T:

0.30

PS Ratio

INGR:

0.82

T:

1.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

INGR:

$5.41B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

INGR:

$1.36B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

INGR:

$902.00M

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INGR vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INGR
INGR Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
INGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
INGR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
INGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
INGR Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INGR vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INGRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

0.92

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.74

-0.46

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.33

-1.03

-0.29

INGR vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INGR Sharpe Ratio is -1.21, which is lower than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INGR and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INGR vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INGR drawdown since its inception was -64.20%, roughly equal to the maximum T drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INGR and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INGRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.20%

-64.15%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.85%

-28.89%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.40%

-28.89%

-7.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.40%

-32.01%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.14%

-42.35%

-13.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.55%

-21.57%

-8.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.37%

-15.74%

-2.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.57%

12.94%

+2.63%

Volatility

INGR vs. T - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) is 5.92%, while AT&T Inc. (T) has a volatility of 9.59%. This indicates that INGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INGRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

9.59%

-3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

19.91%

-7.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.22%

23.72%

-6.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.31%

24.38%

-3.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.87%

23.92%

+0.95%

Dividends

INGR vs. T - Dividend Comparison

INGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than T's 6.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INGR
Ingredion Incorporated
3.20%2.92%1.72%2.75%2.78%2.67%3.23%2.70%2.68%1.57%1.52%1.82%
T
AT&T Inc.
6.58%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

INGR vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ingredion Incorporated and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
33.47B
(INGR) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


INGR and T have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

T has higher volatility (9.59%) compared to INGR (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INGR dropped -64.20% vs T's -64.15%.

T currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.57 vs -1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INGR and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer