INFR vs. ISCMF
INFR (ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the RARE Global Infrastructure Index, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, INFR returned 5.42%/yr vs 16.78%/yr for ISCMF. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. INFR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.
Performance
INFR vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INFR achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 22.87% return.
INFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 7.57%
- 3Y*
- 5.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 22.87%
- 1Y
- 31.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INFR vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 1.41% | 24.00% | -6.23% | 5.20% | -0.19% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 22.87% | 19.65% | 3.13% | -9.58% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between INFR and ISCMF is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2022 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INFR vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank
INFR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ISCMF
INFR vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INFR | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 2.31 | -1.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 5.53 | -4.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.97 | 12.04 | -8.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INFR vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INFR drawdown since its inception was -19.28%, smaller than the maximum ISCMF drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFR and ISCMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INFR | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.28% | -25.42% | +6.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.43% | -5.69% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.48% | -7.62% | -10.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -5.26% | +4.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.91% | -13.36% | +8.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 2.61% | -0.57% |
Volatility
INFR vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) is 0.00%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that INFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INFR | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 5.11% | -5.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.73% | 15.45% | -11.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.90% | 17.84% | -8.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 14.30% | -0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 14.30% | -0.06% |
INFR vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
INFR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
INFR vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison
Neither INFR nor ISCMF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 1.71% | 2.52% | 2.36% | 3.06% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INFR and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISCMF has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to INFR (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INFR dropped -19.28% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.
On 3-year performance, ISCMF leads with 16.78% vs 5.42% for INFR. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, INFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ISCMF has performed better with a 16.78% return vs 5.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for INFR.
INFR has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.
INFR is categorized as Energy Equities, while ISCMF is Commodities. INFR tracks RARE Global Infrastructure Index, while ISCMF tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index. They also come from different issuers: ClearBridge and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for INFR and 0.19% for ISCMF.
ISCMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INFR and ISCMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer