PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INFR vs. COPP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

INFR vs. COPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) and Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

INFR vs. COPP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
INFR
ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF
1.41%24.00%-2.53%
COPP
Sprott Copper Miners ETF
2.61%74.02%4.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INFR achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than COPP's 2.61% return.


INFR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.41%
6M
6.28%
1Y
17.50%
3Y*
5.85%
5Y*
10Y*

COPP

1D
9.20%
1M
-18.73%
YTD
2.61%
6M
29.46%
1Y
86.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


INFR vs. COPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

INFR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than COPP's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

INFR vs. COPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INFR
INFR Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
INFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
INFR Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
INFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
INFR Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

COPP
COPP Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
COPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPP Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
COPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPP Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INFR vs. COPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) and Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INFRCOPPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.26

1.93

-0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.81

2.39

-0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.32

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

2.82

-0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.89

10.92

-1.03

INFR vs. COPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INFR Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the COPP Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INFR and COPP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INFRCOPPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

1.93

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.88

-0.41

Correlation

The correlation between INFR and COPP is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

INFR vs. COPP - Dividend Comparison

INFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than COPP's 2.31% yield.


TTM202520242023
INFR
ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF
2.49%2.52%2.36%3.06%
COPP
Sprott Copper Miners ETF
2.31%2.37%2.59%0.00%

Drawdowns

INFR vs. COPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INFR drawdown since its inception was -19.28%, smaller than the maximum COPP drawdown of -44.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFR and COPP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


INFRCOPPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.28%

-44.37%

+25.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-28.91%

+19.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-19.51%

+18.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-14.33%

+9.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

7.45%

-5.18%

Volatility

INFR vs. COPP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) is 0.00%, while Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) has a volatility of 19.84%. This indicates that INFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


INFRCOPPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

19.84%

-19.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.26%

34.18%

-28.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.68%

44.97%

-30.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.64%

40.03%

-25.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.64%

40.03%

-25.39%