INFO vs. GXLC
INFO (Harbor PanAgora Dynamic Large Cap Core ETF) and GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. INFO is actively managed, while GXLC is passively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. INFO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GXLC.
Performance
INFO vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INFO achieves a 9.15% return, which is significantly higher than GXLC's 8.31% return.
INFO
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- 9.15%
- 6M
- 8.17%
- 1Y
- 26.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXLC
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- YTD
- 8.31%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INFO vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
INFO Harbor PanAgora Dynamic Large Cap Core ETF | 9.15% | 3.64% |
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 8.31% | 3.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between INFO and GXLC is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.98 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INFO vs. GXLC — Risk / Return Rank
INFO
GXLC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
INFO vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor PanAgora Dynamic Large Cap Core ETF (INFO) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INFO | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.01 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INFO vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INFO drawdown since its inception was -19.60%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFO and GXLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INFO | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.60% | -9.08% | -10.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -3.05% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -1.54% | -0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | — | — |
Volatility
INFO vs. GXLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INFO | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.16% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.09% | 13.85% | -0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.51% | 13.85% | +3.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.51% | 13.85% | +3.66% |
INFO vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
INFO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
INFO vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison
INFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than GXLC's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 0.65% | 0.30% | 0.00% |
INFO Harbor PanAgora Dynamic Large Cap Core ETF | 0.32% | 0.35% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, INFO and GXLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for INFO.
GXLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.32% for INFO.
They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for INFO and 0.02% for GXLC.
Find the right allocation for INFO and GXLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer