INFL vs. WWWEX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

INFL (Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF) and WWWEX (Kinetics The Global Fund) are both funds - INFL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Horizon Kinetics LLC, while WWWEX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Kinetics. Over the past 5 years, INFL returned 13.12%/yr vs 13.51%/yr for WWWEX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INFL charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.39%/yr for WWWEX.

Performance

INFL vs. WWWEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) and Kinetics The Global Fund (WWWEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INFL achieves a 17.21% return, which is significantly higher than WWWEX's 4.42% return.

INFL

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: -1.64%
• YTD: 17.21%
• 6M: 17.82%
• 1Y: 23.41%
• 3Y*: 21.83%
• 5Y*: 13.12%
• 10Y*: —

WWWEX

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: -5.15%
• YTD: 4.42%
• 6M: 3.12%
• 1Y: 0.01%
• 3Y*: 30.09%
• 5Y*: 13.51%
• 10Y*: 15.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INFL vs. WWWEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
INFL Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF	17.21%	18.30%	23.34%	1.62%	2.65%	24.77%
WWWEX Kinetics The Global Fund	4.42%	2.89%	72.15%	11.83%	-6.45%	7.96%

Correlation

The correlation between INFL and WWWEX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2021	0.66

The correlation between INFL and WWWEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

INFL vs. WWWEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INFL

INFL Risk / Return Rank: 45
INFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
INFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
INFL Omega Ratio Rank: 40
INFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
INFL Martin Ratio Rank: 46

WWWEX

WWWEX Risk / Return Rank: 3
WWWEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
WWWEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
WWWEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
WWWEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
WWWEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INFL vs. WWWEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) and Kinetics The Global Fund (WWWEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INFL	WWWEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	0.04	+1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	0.16	+1.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.02	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	0.05	+2.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.68	0.12	+7.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INFL vs. WWWEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INFL Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the WWWEX Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INFL and WWWEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INFL	WWWEX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	0.04	+1.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.70	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	0.23	+0.68

Drawdowns

INFL vs. WWWEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INFL drawdown since its inception was -21.30%, smaller than the maximum WWWEX drawdown of -82.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFL and WWWEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	INFL	WWWEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.30%	-82.60%	+61.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.36%	-12.14%	+3.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.56%	-17.66%	+2.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.30%	-26.62%	+5.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.51%	-9.94%	+4.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.10%	-41.31%	+36.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.06%	5.10%	-2.04%

Volatility

INFL vs. WWWEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) is 3.60%, while Kinetics The Global Fund (WWWEX) has a volatility of 3.91%. This indicates that INFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WWWEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INFL	WWWEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.60%	3.91%	-0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.32%	13.52%	-1.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.52%	16.78%	-1.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.71%	19.52%	-1.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.64%	19.18%	-1.54%

INFL vs. WWWEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

INFL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than WWWEX's 1.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

INFL vs. WWWEX - Dividend Comparison

INFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than WWWEX's 2.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INFL Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF	0.91%	1.26%	1.77%	1.60%	1.65%	0.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WWWEX Kinetics The Global Fund	2.47%	2.58%	0.98%	2.50%	1.47%	3.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.08%	9.04%	0.40%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INFL and WWWEX in my portfolio?

INFL and WWWEX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INFL or WWWEX?

WWWEX has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to INFL (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INFL dropped -21.30% vs WWWEX's -82.60%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INFL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.