INFL vs. OOSP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

INFL (Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF) and OOSP (Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INFL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Horizon Kinetics LLC, while OOSP is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Obra. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, INFL returned 23.41% vs 6.71% for OOSP. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. INFL charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for OOSP.

Performance

INFL vs. OOSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) and Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INFL achieves a 17.21% return, which is significantly higher than OOSP's 2.41% return.

INFL

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: -1.64%
• YTD: 17.21%
• 6M: 17.82%
• 1Y: 23.41%
• 3Y*: 21.83%
• 5Y*: 13.12%
• 10Y*: —

OOSP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.91%
• YTD: 2.41%
• 6M: 2.51%
• 1Y: 6.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INFL vs. OOSP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
INFL Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF	17.21%	18.30%	17.11%
OOSP Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF	2.41%	7.41%	6.43%

Correlation

The correlation between INFL and OOSP is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2024	-0.05

Return for Risk

INFL vs. OOSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INFL

INFL Risk / Return Rank: 45
INFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
INFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
INFL Omega Ratio Rank: 40
INFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
INFL Martin Ratio Rank: 46

OOSP

OOSP Risk / Return Rank: 68
OOSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
OOSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
OOSP Omega Ratio Rank: 61
OOSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
OOSP Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INFL vs. OOSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) and Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INFL	OOSP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	1.82	-0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	2.64	-0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.38	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	5.13	-2.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.68	19.01	-11.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INFL vs. OOSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INFL Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the OOSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INFL and OOSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INFL	OOSP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	1.82	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	2.29	-1.38

Drawdowns

INFL vs. OOSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INFL drawdown since its inception was -21.30%, which is greater than OOSP's maximum drawdown of -1.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFL and OOSP.

Drawdown Indicators

	INFL	OOSP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.30%	-1.31%	-19.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.36%	-1.31%	-7.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.51%	-0.18%	-5.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.10%	-0.20%	-4.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.06%	0.35%	+2.71%

Volatility

INFL vs. OOSP - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP) at 1.23%. This indicates that INFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OOSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INFL	OOSP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.60%	1.23%	+2.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.32%	2.23%	+10.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.52%	3.71%	+11.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.71%	3.35%	+14.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.64%	3.35%	+14.29%

INFL vs. OOSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

INFL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than OOSP's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

INFL vs. OOSP - Dividend Comparison

INFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than OOSP's 6.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
INFL Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF	0.91%	1.26%	1.77%	1.60%	1.65%	0.91%
OOSP Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF	6.47%	6.71%	5.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INFL and OOSP in my portfolio?

INFL and OOSP have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INFL or OOSP?

INFL has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to OOSP (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INFL dropped -21.30% vs OOSP's -1.31%.

Which ETF is better, INFL or OOSP?

On 1-year performance, INFL leads with 23.41% vs 6.71% for OOSP. On fees, INFL is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, OOSP has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INFL or OOSP?

Over the 1-year period, INFL has performed better with a 23.41% return vs 6.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INFL or OOSP?

INFL is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for OOSP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INFL or OOSP?

OOSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.47%, compared with 0.91% for INFL.

What is the main difference between INFL and OOSP?

INFL is categorized as Global Equities, while OOSP is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Horizon Kinetics LLC and Obra. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for INFL and 0.90% for OOSP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OOSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.