INFH vs. QQQY
INFH (Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF) and QQQY (Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INFH is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while QQQY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance. Both are actively managed. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. INFH charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for QQQY.
Performance
INFH vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
INFH
- 1D
- 17.48%
- 1M
- -52.72%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QQQY
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- 6M
- 9.56%
- YTD
- 11.15%
- 1Y
- 18.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.52%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.99M | $2.39M | $2.98M | |
| $2.05M | $2.30M | $2.99M |
INFH vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
INFH Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF | -70.81% |
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF | -6.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between INFH and QQQY is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INFH vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank
INFH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QQQY
INFH vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF (INFH) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INFH | QQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.68 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.22 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INFH vs. QQQY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INFH drawdown since its inception was -75.15%, which is greater than QQQY's maximum drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFH and QQQY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INFH | QQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.15% | -19.05% | -56.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.81% | -6.99% | -63.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.80% | -2.94% | -44.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.00% | — |
Volatility
INFH vs. QQQY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INFH | QQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 202.20% | 16.98% | +185.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 202.20% | 15.61% | +186.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 202.20% | 15.61% | +186.59% |
INFH vs. QQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison
INFH has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
INFH vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison
INFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
INFH Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF | 37.85% | 45.34% | 83.34% | 20.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INFH and QQQY have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for INFH.
QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 37.85%, compared with 0.00% for INFH.
INFH is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQY is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for INFH and 0.99% for QQQY.
Find the right allocation for INFH and QQQY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer