INFH vs. IREG
INFH (Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF) and IREG (Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INFH charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for IREG.
Performance
INFH vs. IREG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
INFH
- 1D
- -17.96%
- 1M
- -59.76%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IREG
- 1D
- -17.70%
- 1M
- -68.18%
- 6M
- -75.75%
- YTD
- -56.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INFH vs. IREG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
INFH Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF | -74.38% |
IREG Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF | -72.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between INFH and IREG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INFH vs. IREG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF (INFH) and Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF (IREG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INFH vs. IREG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INFH drawdown since its inception was -74.38%, smaller than the maximum IREG drawdown of -82.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFH and IREG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INFH | IREG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.38% | -82.72% | +8.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.38% | -82.72% | +8.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.87% | -47.36% | +5.49% |
Volatility
INFH vs. IREG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INFH | IREG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 198.78% | 208.41% | -9.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 198.78% | 208.41% | -9.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 198.78% | 208.41% | -9.63% |
INFH vs. IREG - Expense Ratio Comparison
INFH has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than IREG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
INFH vs. IREG - Dividend Comparison
Neither INFH nor IREG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
INFH and IREG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IREG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IREG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for INFH.
INFH and IREG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for INFH and 0.75% for IREG.
Find the right allocation for INFH and IREG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer