PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INFH vs. CBRG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INFH vs. CBRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF (INFH) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CBRS Daily ETF (CBRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


INFH

1D
-17.96%
1M
-59.76%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CBRG

1D
-4.44%
1M
-39.40%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INFH vs. CBRG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between INFH and CBRG is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026

0.58

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INFH vs. CBRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF (INFH) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CBRS Daily ETF (CBRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

INFH vs. CBRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INFH vs. CBRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INFH drawdown since its inception was -74.38%, roughly equal to the maximum CBRG drawdown of -74.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFH and CBRG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INFHCBRGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.38%

-74.80%

+0.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.38%

-73.80%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.87%

-19.83%

-22.04%

Volatility

INFH vs. CBRG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INFHCBRGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

198.78%

156.66%

+42.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

198.78%

156.66%

+42.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

198.78%

156.66%

+42.12%

INFH vs. CBRG - Expense Ratio Comparison

INFH has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than CBRG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

INFH vs. CBRG - Dividend Comparison

Neither INFH nor CBRG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


INFH and CBRG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBRG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBRG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for INFH.

INFH and CBRG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for INFH and 0.75% for CBRG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INFH and CBRG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer