INFH vs. AMDG

Last updated Jul 28, 2026

INFH (Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF) and AMDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. INFH charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AMDG.

Performance

INFH vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF (INFH) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

INFH

• 1D: 17.48%
• 1M: -52.72%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

AMDG

• 1D: -9.82%
• 1M: -13.72%
• 6M: 173.91%
• YTD: 266.85%
• 1Y: 392.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 270.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	$7.60M	$7.50M	$8.81M
INFH Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF	$1.99M	$2.39M	$2.98M

INFH vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
INFH Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF	-70.81%
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	-19.84%

Correlation

The correlation between INFH and AMDG is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026	0.45

Return for Risk

INFH vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INFH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMDG

AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 91
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 88
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INFH vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF (INFH) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INFH	AMDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.85	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.10	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.39	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	7.01	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	13.36	—

Drawdowns

INFH vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INFH drawdown since its inception was -75.15%, which is greater than AMDG's maximum drawdown of -63.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFH and AMDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	INFH	AMDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.15%	-63.32%	-11.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-56.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-70.81%	-30.58%	-40.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.80%	-24.88%	-22.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	29.56%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	INFH	AMDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	43.66%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	108.76%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	202.20%	139.38%	+62.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	202.20%	133.16%	+69.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	202.20%	133.16%	+69.04%

INFH vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

INFH has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

INFH vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison

INFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%.

Position	TTM	2025
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	3.05%	11.21%
INFH Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INFH and AMDG in my portfolio?

INFH and AMDG have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, INFH or AMDG?

On fees, AMDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, INFH or AMDG?

AMDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for INFH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INFH or AMDG?

AMDG has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.00% for INFH.

What is the main difference between INFH and AMDG?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for INFH and 0.75% for AMDG.