INFA vs. PWR

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

INFA (Informatica Inc.) and PWR (Quanta Services, Inc.) are both stocks.

Performance

INFA vs. PWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Informatica Inc. (INFA) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

INFA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PWR

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -6.87%
• YTD: 64.46%
• 6M: 49.89%
• 1Y: 92.19%
• 3Y*: 56.18%
• 5Y*: 49.77%
• 10Y*: 40.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INFA vs. PWR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
INFA Informatica Inc.	0.00%
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.	-4.97%

Fundamentals

Market Cap INFA : $7.70B PWR : $105.52B
EPS INFA : $0.03 PWR : $7.29
PE Ratio INFA : 727.98 PWR : 95.17
PS Ratio INFA : 4.53 PWR : 3.51
PB Ratio INFA : 3.14 PWR : 11.67
Total Revenue (TTM) INFA : $1.68B PWR : $29.99B
Gross Profit (TTM) INFA : $1.36B PWR : $4.08B
EBITDA (TTM) INFA : $323.83M PWR : $2.40B

Return for Risk

INFA vs. PWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWR

PWR Risk / Return Rank: 93
PWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
PWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
PWR Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
PWR Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INFA vs. PWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Informatica Inc. (INFA) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INFA	PWR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.35	—

Drawdowns

INFA vs. PWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INFA drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum PWR drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFA and PWR.

Drawdown Indicators

	INFA	PWR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-97.07%	+97.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.45%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-33.89%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.89%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-11.64%	+11.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-46.86%	+46.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.15%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	INFA	PWR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.16%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	29.60%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	36.37%	-36.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	35.62%	-35.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	33.70%	-33.70%

Dividends

INFA vs. PWR - Dividend Comparison

INFA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
INFA Informatica Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.	0.06%	0.09%	0.09%	0.15%	0.25%	0.16%	0.29%	0.42%	0.13%

Financials

INFA vs. PWR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Informatica Inc. and Quanta Services, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

INFA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Informatica Inc. reported a gross profit of 358.74M and revenue of 439.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.7%.

PWR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 7.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.1%.

INFA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Informatica Inc. reported an operating income of 60.87M and revenue of 439.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.

PWR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 338.78M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

INFA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Informatica Inc. reported a net income of 4.00M and revenue of 439.16M, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.

PWR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 220.63M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.