INEQ vs. SBND
INEQ (Columbia International Equity Income ETF) and SBND (Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INEQ is a Dividend fund actively managed by Columbia, while SBND is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg Beta Advantage Short Term Bond (-300%). INEQ is actively managed, while SBND is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, INEQ returned 20.29%/yr vs 5.86%/yr for SBND. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. INEQ charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SBND.
Performance
INEQ vs. SBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INEQ achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly higher than SBND's 0.86% return.
INEQ
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 7.09%
- YTD
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 28.80%
- 3Y*
- 20.29%
- 5Y*
- 13.46%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.16%
SBND
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- 6M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- 3.56%
- 3Y*
- 5.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $606.92K | $766.57K | $703.44K | |
| $2.32M | $2.73M | $1.61M |
INEQ vs. SBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 12.10% | 39.85% | 6.02% | 20.88% | -5.95% | -0.63% |
SBND Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF | 0.86% | 7.50% | 4.83% | 7.20% | -7.24% | -0.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between INEQ and SBND is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2021 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INEQ vs. SBND — Risk / Return Rank
INEQ
SBND
INEQ vs. SBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF (SBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INEQ | SBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.30 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 2.18 | +0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.69 | 9.00 | +0.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INEQ vs. SBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INEQ drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, which is greater than SBND's maximum drawdown of -10.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INEQ and SBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INEQ | SBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.71% | -10.78% | -30.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | -1.71% | -7.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.38% | -1.71% | -12.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -0.40% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | -2.78% | -4.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 0.41% | +2.55% |
Volatility
INEQ vs. SBND - Volatility Comparison
Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF (SBND) at 0.56%. This indicates that INEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INEQ | SBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.27% | 0.56% | +3.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.47% | 1.75% | +9.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 2.40% | +11.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.33% | 3.57% | +11.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.37% | 3.57% | +12.80% |
INEQ vs. SBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
INEQ has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SBND's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
INEQ vs. SBND - Dividend Comparison
INEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%, more than SBND's 4.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 9.31% | 9.76% | 3.11% | 3.27% | 3.57% | 3.43% | 2.64% | 3.34% | 7.25% | 4.63% | 2.52% |
SBND Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF | 4.10% | 4.65% | 4.58% | 3.90% | 2.80% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INEQ and SBND have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INEQ has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to SBND (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INEQ dropped -41.71% vs SBND's -10.78%.
On 3-year performance, INEQ leads with 20.29% vs 5.86% for SBND. On fees, SBND is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SBND has been the lower-risk option at 0.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, INEQ has performed better with a 20.29% return vs 5.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SBND is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for INEQ.
INEQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.31%, compared with 4.10% for SBND.
INEQ is categorized as Dividend, while SBND is Short-Term Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for INEQ and 0.25% for SBND.
INEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INEQ and SBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer