INEQ vs. REMC
INEQ (Columbia International Equity Income ETF) and REMC (Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INEQ is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Columbia Threadneedle, while REMC is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Beta Advantage Research Enhanced Mid Cap Index. INEQ is actively managed, while REMC is passively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INEQ charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for REMC.
Performance
INEQ vs. REMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INEQ achieves a 7.86% return, which is significantly lower than REMC's 12.17% return.
INEQ
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 6.75%
- YTD
- 7.86%
- 1Y
- 23.14%
- 3Y*
- 19.56%
- 5Y*
- 12.35%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
REMC
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- 12.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INEQ vs. REMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 7.86% | 2.34% |
REMC Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 12.17% | -1.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between INEQ and REMC is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INEQ vs. REMC — Risk / Return Rank
INEQ
REMC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
INEQ vs. REMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (REMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INEQ | REMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.67 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INEQ vs. REMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INEQ drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, which is greater than REMC's maximum drawdown of -6.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INEQ and REMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INEQ | REMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.71% | -6.64% | -35.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.02% | -0.12% | -2.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -1.42% | -5.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | — | — |
Volatility
INEQ vs. REMC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INEQ | REMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.33% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.68% | 12.19% | +1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.31% | 12.19% | +3.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.35% | 12.19% | +4.16% |
INEQ vs. REMC - Expense Ratio Comparison
INEQ has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than REMC's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
INEQ vs. REMC - Dividend Comparison
INEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.68%, more than REMC's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 9.68% | 9.76% | 3.11% | 3.27% | 3.57% | 3.43% | 2.64% | 3.34% | 7.25% | 4.63% | 2.52% |
REMC Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 0.07% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INEQ and REMC have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, REMC is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
REMC is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for INEQ.
INEQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.68%, compared with 0.07% for REMC.
INEQ is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while REMC is Mid Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for INEQ and 0.32% for REMC.
Find the right allocation for INEQ and REMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer