PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INEQ vs. EQIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INEQ vs. EQIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF (EQIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with INEQ having a 12.10% return and EQIN slightly higher at 12.56%. Over the past 10 years, INEQ has underperformed EQIN with an annualized return of 9.92%, while EQIN has yielded a comparatively higher 12.18% annualized return.


INEQ

1D
-0.61%
1M
4.84%
6M
7.09%
YTD
12.10%
1Y
28.80%
3Y*
20.29%
5Y*
13.46%
10Y*
9.92%
ALL TIME*
10.16%

EQIN

1D
0.14%
1M
1.17%
6M
7.74%
YTD
12.56%
1Y
22.31%
3Y*
13.29%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
12.18%
ALL TIME*
12.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$544.80K$711.69K$787.66K
$606.92K$766.57K$703.44K

INEQ vs. EQIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INEQ
Columbia International Equity Income ETF
12.10%39.85%6.02%20.88%-5.95%10.18%-0.52%15.83%-18.30%24.88%
EQIN
Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF
12.56%9.37%13.82%11.58%0.66%31.18%0.67%30.67%-12.22%20.05%

Correlation

The correlation between INEQ and EQIN is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2016

0.60

The correlation between INEQ and EQIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

INEQ vs. EQIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INEQ
EQIN

Financial Services

27.2%
28.9%

Industrials

14.0%
10.5%

Basic Materials

10.4%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

9.5%
10.1%

Energy

9.3%
12.5%

Healthcare

8.7%
7.3%

Communication Services

8.0%
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
8.6%

Utilities

3.6%
4.3%

Real Estate

2.1%

-

Technology

1.6%
10.3%

Financial Services

INEQ
27.2%
EQIN
28.9%

Industrials

INEQ
14.0%
EQIN
10.5%

Basic Materials

INEQ
10.4%
EQIN
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

INEQ
9.5%
EQIN
10.1%

Energy

INEQ
9.3%
EQIN
12.5%

Healthcare

INEQ
8.7%
EQIN
7.3%

Communication Services

INEQ
8.0%
EQIN
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

INEQ
5.6%
EQIN
8.6%

Utilities

INEQ
3.6%
EQIN
4.3%

Real Estate

INEQ
2.1%
EQIN

-

Technology

INEQ
1.6%
EQIN
10.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INEQ vs. EQIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

INEQ
INEQ Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
INEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
INEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
INEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
INEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

EQIN
EQIN Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
EQIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQIN Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EQIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQIN Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

INEQ vs. EQIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF (EQIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INEQEQINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.36

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

3.96

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.69

12.26

-2.57

INEQ vs. EQIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INEQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the EQIN Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INEQ and EQIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INEQ vs. EQIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INEQ drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, roughly equal to the maximum EQIN drawdown of -42.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INEQ and EQIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INEQEQINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.71%

-42.16%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

-5.41%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.38%

-12.05%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.51%

-18.51%

-6.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.71%

-42.16%

+0.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-1.50%

+0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.00%

-4.83%

-2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

1.75%

+1.21%

Volatility

INEQ vs. EQIN - Volatility Comparison

Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF (EQIN) at 3.33%. This indicates that INEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INEQEQINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

3.33%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.47%

7.32%

+4.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.57%

10.55%

+3.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.33%

14.52%

+0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.37%

18.47%

-2.10%

INEQ vs. EQIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

INEQ has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than EQIN's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

INEQ vs. EQIN - Dividend Comparison

INEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%, more than EQIN's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EQIN
Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF
1.86%2.05%4.34%2.41%2.71%2.57%2.54%2.70%7.81%11.52%2.44%
INEQ
Columbia International Equity Income ETF
9.31%9.76%3.11%3.27%3.57%3.43%2.64%3.34%7.25%4.63%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


INEQ and EQIN have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INEQ has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to EQIN (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INEQ dropped -41.71% vs EQIN's -42.16%.

On 10-year performance, EQIN leads with 12.18% vs 9.92% for INEQ. On fees, EQIN is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EQIN has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EQIN has performed better with a 12.18% return vs 9.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EQIN is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for INEQ.

INEQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.31%, compared with 1.86% for EQIN.

Their fees differ too: 0.45% for INEQ and 0.35% for EQIN.

INEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INEQ and EQIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer