INEQ vs. ABBV
INEQ (Columbia International Equity Income ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Columbia Threadneedle, while ABBV (AbbVie Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, INEQ returned 11.72%/yr vs 19.28%/yr for ABBV. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
INEQ vs. ABBV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INEQ achieves a 7.04% return, which is significantly higher than ABBV's 0.06% return.
INEQ
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 7.04%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 25.40%
- 3Y*
- 19.86%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- —
ABBV
- 1D
- 3.60%
- 1M
- 9.14%
- YTD
- 0.06%
- 6M
- -0.03%
- 1Y
- 23.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.32%
- 5Y*
- 19.28%
- 10Y*
- 18.38%
INEQ vs. ABBV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 7.04% | 39.85% | 6.02% | 20.88% | -5.95% | 10.18% | -0.52% | 15.83% | -18.30% | 24.88% |
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 0.06% | 33.08% | 18.86% | -0.23% | 24.01% | 32.43% | 27.72% | 1.47% | -0.96% | 60.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between INEQ and ABBV is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2016 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INEQ vs. ABBV — Risk / Return Rank
INEQ
ABBV
INEQ vs. ABBV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INEQ | ABBV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.19 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 1.39 | +1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.79 | 3.12 | +6.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INEQ | ABBV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 0.99 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.85 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.74 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
INEQ vs. ABBV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INEQ drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, smaller than the maximum ABBV drawdown of -45.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INEQ and ABBV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INEQ | ABBV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.71% | -45.09% | +3.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | -17.32% | +7.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.38% | -20.74% | +6.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.51% | -21.92% | -2.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.75% | -5.77% | +2.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -10.73% | +3.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 7.70% | -5.10% |
Volatility
INEQ vs. ABBV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ) is 3.73%, while AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) has a volatility of 6.21%. This indicates that INEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABBV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INEQ | ABBV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 6.21% | -2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.60% | 17.96% | -7.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.45% | 24.22% | -10.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.29% | 22.90% | -7.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 25.76% | -9.45% |
Dividends
INEQ vs. ABBV - Dividend Comparison
INEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.22%, more than ABBV's 3.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 3.00% | 2.87% | 3.49% | 3.82% | 3.49% | 3.84% | 4.41% | 4.83% | 3.89% | 2.65% | 3.64% | 3.41% |
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF | 9.22% | 9.76% | 3.11% | 3.27% | 3.57% | 3.43% | 2.64% | 3.34% | 7.25% | 4.63% | 2.52% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INEQ and ABBV have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABBV has higher volatility (6.21%) compared to INEQ (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INEQ dropped -41.71% vs ABBV's -45.09%.
INEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INEQ and ABBV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer